[Scons-users] F90PPCOM vs F90COM not invoked correctly

[Bill Deegan]

Does msys allow a.F90 and a.f90 in same dir?


On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 9:57 AM Mats Wichmann <mats at wichmann.us> wrote:

> On 4/16/20 10:35 AM, Luke Robison wrote:
>
> > Mats,
> >
> > Interesting to note that the list is missing .F90 .F95 .F03 .F08.  I
> > think the scanner would only affect the dependency generation, right?
> > The Fortran Tool already defines it's own scanners, I'm not sure why any
> > fortran file extensions would be in that CScanner list.
>
> I figured it was because they're expected to be c-preprocessed, which is
> what you were talking about - that's what is documented in
> "SYSTEM-SPECIFIC BEHAVIOR" in the manpage.  Maybe the others you mention
> above are missing because they were not intended to have this effect -
> they're not documented as such - or maybe someone just forgot?
>
> elsewise, this part of the codebase is opqaue to me, I haven't looked at
> it directly.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-users mailing list
> Scons-users at scons.org
> https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist4.pair.net/pipermail/scons-users/attachments/20200416/8ecfee6d/attachment-0001.html>