[Scons-users] F90PPCOM vs F90COM not invoked correctly

[Luke Robison]

No, it would not allow those in the same directory.

On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 1:52 PM Bill Deegan <bill at baddogconsulting.com>
wrote:

> Does msys allow a.F90 and a.f90 in same dir?
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 9:57 AM Mats Wichmann <mats at wichmann.us> wrote:
>
>> On 4/16/20 10:35 AM, Luke Robison wrote:
>>
>> > Mats,
>> >
>> > Interesting to note that the list is missing .F90 .F95 .F03 .F08.  I
>> > think the scanner would only affect the dependency generation, right?
>> > The Fortran Tool already defines it's own scanners, I'm not sure why any
>> > fortran file extensions would be in that CScanner list.
>>
>> I figured it was because they're expected to be c-preprocessed, which is
>> what you were talking about - that's what is documented in
>> "SYSTEM-SPECIFIC BEHAVIOR" in the manpage.  Maybe the others you mention
>> above are missing because they were not intended to have this effect -
>> they're not documented as such - or maybe someone just forgot?
>>
>> elsewise, this part of the codebase is opqaue to me, I haven't looked at
>> it directly.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Scons-users mailing list
>> Scons-users at scons.org
>> https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-users mailing list
> Scons-users at scons.org
> https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist4.pair.net/pipermail/scons-users/attachments/20200416/a79e7909/attachment.html>