[Scons-users] [Scons-dev] Is anyone using Subversion/RCS/SCCS/BitKeeper/Perforce/CVS SCons tools?

[Roberto De Vecchi]

Never used +1

From: Scons-users [mailto:scons-users-bounces at scons.org] On Behalf Of Jason Kenny
Sent: 21 March 2017 16:13
To: SCons developer list <scons-dev at scons.org>; SCons users mailing list <scons-users at scons.org>
Subject: Re: [Scons-users] [Scons-dev] Is anyone using Subversion/RCS/SCCS/BitKeeper/Perforce/CVS SCons tools?

I replaced it with something different in Parts as the issues with the “per-file” logic breaks on different systems like git and honestly slows the build down the way it is in SCons.

I found it better to have this be a “startup” action which gets all the files, rather than get a file as needed, which requires lots of updates on a remote system.

+1 for removing this

Jason

From: Scons-dev [mailto:scons-dev-bounces at scons.org] On Behalf Of Bill Deegan
Sent: Monday, March 20, 2017 1:07 PM
To: SCons developer list <scons-dev at scons.org<mailto:scons-dev at scons.org>>; SCons users mailing list <scons-users at scons.org<mailto:scons-users at scons.org>>
Subject: [Scons-dev] Is anyone using Subversion/RCS/SCCS/BitKeeper/Perforce/CVS SCons tools?

Greetings,
They've been deprecated for many years.
I'll be removing them in the next release (expected to be called 3.0)
If this is going to break your builds, please speak up?
We might consider migrating them to contrib.

-Bill
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist4.pair.net/pipermail/scons-users/attachments/20170321/40261acb/attachment-0001.html>