[Scons-users] [Scons-dev] Is anyone using Subversion/RCS/SCCS/BitKeeper/Perforce/CVS SCons tools?

[William Blevins]

+1

On Mar 21, 2017 1:23 PM, "Roberto De Vecchi" <roberto.devecchi at vi-grade.com>
wrote:

> Never used +1
>
>
>
> *From:* Scons-users [mailto:scons-users-bounces at scons.org] *On Behalf Of *Jason
> Kenny
> *Sent:* 21 March 2017 16:13
> *To:* SCons developer list <scons-dev at scons.org>; SCons users mailing
> list <scons-users at scons.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [Scons-users] [Scons-dev] Is anyone using
> Subversion/RCS/SCCS/BitKeeper/Perforce/CVS SCons tools?
>
>
>
> I replaced it with something different in Parts as the issues with the
> “per-file” logic breaks on different systems like git and honestly slows
> the build down the way it is in SCons.
>
>
>
> I found it better to have this be a “startup” action which gets all the
> files, rather than get a file as needed, which requires lots of updates on
> a remote system.
>
>
>
> +1 for removing this
>
>
>
> Jason
>
>
>
> *From:* Scons-dev [mailto:scons-dev-bounces at scons.org
> <scons-dev-bounces at scons.org>] *On Behalf Of *Bill Deegan
> *Sent:* Monday, March 20, 2017 1:07 PM
> *To:* SCons developer list <scons-dev at scons.org>; SCons users mailing
> list <scons-users at scons.org>
> *Subject:* [Scons-dev] Is anyone using Subversion/RCS/SCCS/BitKeeper/Perforce/CVS
> SCons tools?
>
>
>
> Greetings,
>
> They've been deprecated for many years.
>
> I'll be removing them in the next release (expected to be called 3.0)
>
> If this is going to break your builds, please speak up?
>
> We might consider migrating them to contrib.
>
>
>
> -Bill
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-users mailing list
> Scons-users at scons.org
> https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist4.pair.net/pipermail/scons-users/attachments/20170321/e0308f86/attachment.html>