[Scons-users] Ignoring (some) errors

[William Blevins]

You can still do it as part of SCons and make the building in two phases
using targets and/or aliases.

On Mon, Apr 13, 2015 at 3:09 PM, Marc Branchaud <marcnarc at xiplink.com>
wrote:

> On 15-04-10 08:34 PM, William Blevins wrote:
> > Marc,
> >
> > My recommendation is to run SCons twice with different "targets" and
> > options.  Their will be some overhead, but I don't see another (easy)
> way to
> > do what you are asking.
> >
> > Pass 1) Run scons (on build targets) like normal so that it fails like
> normal
> > if anything fails to build.
> > Pass 2) Run scons (on assembling targets) with -k option.
>
> I was hoping to avoid that -- it means defining part of the build outside
> of
> our SCons scripts -- but so far it seems like the most viable solution.
>
>                 M.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-users mailing list
> Scons-users at scons.org
> https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist4.pair.net/pipermail/scons-users/attachments/20150414/565e3376/attachment.html>