[Scons-users] Ignoring (some) errors
marcnarc at xiplink.com
Mon Apr 13 15:09:46 EDT 2015
On 15-04-10 08:34 PM, William Blevins wrote:
> My recommendation is to run SCons twice with different "targets" and
> options. Their will be some overhead, but I don't see another (easy) way to
> do what you are asking.
> Pass 1) Run scons (on build targets) like normal so that it fails like normal
> if anything fails to build.
> Pass 2) Run scons (on assembling targets) with -k option.
I was hoping to avoid that -- it means defining part of the build outside of
our SCons scripts -- but so far it seems like the most viable solution.
More information about the Scons-users