[kj] Question about this...unpleasantness.

[Rob Moss]

It's obviously the latter. 

Look at the Coleman modus operandi. 
Anyone who thinks Cormac wasn't done over is being too generous. 

Coleman doesn't want your money people. He told you that. 

He wants your soul. 

Do not sup with the devil. 





On 23 Aug 2012, at 08:09, F Luke <fluke1 at live.co.uk> wrote:


> What needs to be established is whether it was a deliberate attempt by Jaz to sabotage the tour, or was it just Jaz speaking privately to someone .

>    If it was a mindless drunken rant, then it should have been kept that way, but if it was a deliberate ploy by Jaz to get the tour postponed , then he did indeed use Cormac .

>    I think that everyone can agree to that.

> 

> From: kjlist at live.com

> To: jimharper666 at yahoo.co.uk; gathering at misera.net

> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 14:44:44 -0500

> Subject: Re: [kj] Question about this...unpleasantness.

> 

> Well, there we are, then.

>  

> Confirmed: bumblers

>  

> Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 20:33:44 +0100

> From: jimharper666 at yahoo.co.uk

> To: gathering at misera.net

> Subject: Re: [kj] Question about this...unpleasantness.

> 

> I recall being told that Jaz's comments were part of a message to the Gathering, transcribed for the express purpose of communicating with the Gathering.

>  

> Jim.

>  

> From: Rheinhold Squeegee <kjlist at live.com>

> To: Gathering Gathering <gathering at misera.net> 

> Sent: Wednesday, 22 August 2012, 20:13

> Subject: [kj] Question about this...unpleasantness.

> 

> Not trolling. Honestly.

>  

> So, is the implication here that Cormac acted at the behest of Jaz, the band or its management in posting those comments on the KJ Facebook page with the express purpose of doing sabotage to the September Cult shows? And that Cormac is now being used as a scapegoat by Jaz, the band or its management?

>  

> It seemed pretty clear from the beginning that Cormac had, unbeknownst to Jaz, transcribed those incendiary comments from a private conversation which he then posted to the KJ Facebook page without the knowledge of Jaz or the band/management. Jaz is well known for making outrageous statements (or just lying a lot) but would he have done so with Cormac if he had known he was speaking ex cathedra and that his words would be subsequently quoted as a formal statement from the band?

>  

> This whole thing reminds me of the conflicting defense strategies during the OJ Simpson trial, i.e. that KJ is both a disorganized collection of bumbling buffoons while also being masterminds able to perpetrate a conspiracy of almost unimanageable complexity involving all levels of the band, its management and fans. 

>  

> So which is it? 

>  

> Again, not trolling. I have nothing to gain other than edification. I'm not on anyone's side.

>  

> My vote: bumblers

> 

> _______________________________________________

> Gathering mailing list

> Gathering at misera.net

> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

> 

> 

> 

> _______________________________________________ Gathering mailing list Gathering at misera.net http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

> 

> _______________________________________________ Gathering mailing list Gathering at misera.net http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

> _______________________________________________

> Gathering mailing list

> Gathering at misera.net

> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/gathering/attachments/20120823/65d2132b/attachment.html>