[kj] New Interview with Jaz Wherein He Discourses at Length on a Variety ...

[Devacor at aol.com]

Libertarians are for limited gov't
Which is why Ron and Rand support our lobbying efforts for small  
farms/organics as they believe gov't doesn't needing to be hypermandating  farms- 
farmers know how to farm. 
 
Same goes for business- they are against hyper mandating and  regulation- 
in this instance they arent for affirmative action. Which the  initial 
reaction to that  is it may seem racist or good ol' boy- but  its just saying that 
gov't should stay out of the process and businesses  should be able to hire 
the best person they see fit for the job. 
 I can see up and downs with both- downside with aff action is  possibly 
hiring people for jobs who arent the most qualified for the  position and it 
'discriminates' against a more qualified individual-  downside of no 
regulation is that it could turn into  (race/sex) discrimination. 
 
If I don't recall  the media jumped all over this, but after it  was 
actually explained out it turned into a non issue. 
 
 
 
 

 
In a message dated 4/8/2011 7:32:06 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,  
saulomar1 at yahoo.com writes:

There's that interview where he elliptically asserts that  whatever the 
civil rights laws, that (private) business should not  be bound by them and 
should be able to discriminate (for and) against  the public as they, um, "see 
fit." Taking it to its logical conclusion,  anything but anything private 
that is categorized as "for profit" in  some way can thus be considered a 
commercial interest and will thus be  empowered to DISCRIMINATE. 
 
Can't remember his other positions, but  can look into  this even more.
 
D'oh! did I say discriminate? I think he may have wanted us all  to 
hear-think "discern."  Ha!




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/gathering/attachments/20110408/840e9cde/attachment-0001.html>