[kj] FW: Michael Jackson dead

[Darren A. Peace]

I could understand the probity (if not the ethics) of paying off false
accusers to preserve an untainted reputation; the fact that charges had
already been brought before he made settlements is less justifiable.

 

And as Bob pointed out, if someone can suggest to me a scenario whereby
Gavin Arviso being able to accurately describe a mole on MJ's penis is
indicative of appropriate behaviour, I might change my position.

 

Thought not. Nonce.

 

Darren

Hungerford, UK

 

From: gathering-bounces at misera.net [mailto:gathering-bounces at misera.net] On
Behalf Of ade
Sent: 29 June 2009 4:24 PM
To: A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!)
Subject: Re: [kj] FW: Michael Jackson dead

 

No, my mind isn't made up on this one, but yeah fair comment, it normally
is. But in this case I'm

clearly saying I'm on the fence about it. Nevertheless, if he IS guilty of
kiddy meddling, I'll have a

t-shirt made of the same. If he isn't, he'll just be another dead mediocre
mainstream pile o' shite.

-----Original Message-----
From: gathering-bounces at misera.net [mailto:gathering-bounces at misera.net]On
Behalf Of Jim Harper
Sent: 29 June 2009 16:12
To: A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!)
Subject: Re: [kj] FW: Michael Jackson dead


And so is yours, quite obviously, and that's pretty normal. The sign of an
active mind, I would say. The problems come when you ignore evidence and
cling on to unlikely beliefs out of habit. Since neither of us is presenting
evidence- just theories- I don't see how having an opinion is somehow
'wrong'.

 

Jim.


--- On Mon, 29/6/09, ade <ade at the-lab.zetnet.co.uk> wrote:

I'm not going to argue with you about it mate, your mind is already made up.

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/gathering/attachments/20090629/9fce990c/attachment.html>