[kj] FW: Michael Jackson dead

[ade]

You know what? Unlike many, I really know fuck all about that case, other than there were kids
involved & he got off/paid money to families. The bit about the mole is new to me - I just didn't care
enough at the time to follow the case/media circus. I assume you got through ten tonne of popcorn
throughout. The whole cock-mole debacle sounds pretty damning, I agree.
 
As I said before, if stuff comes to light & he's proper guilty, I'll be celebrating another kiddy
fiddler dead.

-----Original Message-----
From: gathering-bounces at misera.net [mailto:gathering-bounces at misera.net]On Behalf Of Darren A. Peace
Sent: 29 June 2009 16:42
To: 'A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!)'
Subject: Re: [kj] FW: Michael Jackson dead



I could understand the probity (if not the ethics) of paying off false accusers to preserve an untainted reputation; the fact that charges had already been brought before he made settlements is less justifiable.

 

And as Bob pointed out, if someone can suggest to me a scenario whereby Gavin Arviso being able to accurately describe a mole on MJ's penis is indicative of appropriate behaviour, I might change my position.

 

Thought not. Nonce.

 

Darren

Hungerford, UK

 

From: gathering-bounces at misera.net [mailto:gathering-bounces at misera.net] On Behalf Of ade
Sent: 29 June 2009 4:24 PM
To: A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!)
Subject: Re: [kj] FW: Michael Jackson dead

 

No, my mind isn't made up on this one, but yeah fair comment, it normally is. But in this case I'm

clearly saying I'm on the fence about it. Nevertheless, if he IS guilty of kiddy meddling, I'll have a

t-shirt made of the same. If he isn't, he'll just be another dead mediocre mainstream pile o' shite.

-----Original Message-----
From: gathering-bounces at misera.net [mailto:gathering-bounces at misera.net]On Behalf Of Jim Harper
Sent: 29 June 2009 16:12
To: A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!)
Subject: Re: [kj] FW: Michael Jackson dead


And so is yours, quite obviously, and that's pretty normal. The sign of an active mind, I would say. The problems come when you ignore evidence and cling on to unlikely beliefs out of habit. Since neither of us is presenting evidence- just theories- I don't see how having an opinion is somehow 'wrong'.

 

Jim.


--- On Mon, 29/6/09, ade <ade at the-lab.zetnet.co.uk> wrote:

I'm not going to argue with you about it mate, your mind is already made up.

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/gathering/attachments/20090629/9b40ca4a/attachment.htm>