[kj] OT: Apocalypto

[BS Crack]

  Yes. I believe that freedom of speech should take preference over people being offended .
I also would have liked Saddam to have written his autobiography whilst in jail , detailing the reasons why he invaded Kuwait and what assurances he received from the US before Kuwaits invasion. I would have like to have heard his viewpoint and it would have been an important document for historians.


--- Partyslammer at socal.rr.com wrote:

From: "TB" <Partyslammer at socal.rr.com>
To: <BSCrack at UltimateEmail.com>,        "A list about all things Killing Joke \(the band!\)" <gathering at misera.net>
Subject: Re: [kj] OT: Apocalypto
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 08:27:57 -0800

"BS Crack" farted:

>

>  No, friend with limited intelligence . I agree that there should be open 

> debate about issues. If people wish to deny the holocaust, then they 

> should have a right to do so . Then others will be able to point out the 

> facts that prove that the Holocaust took place. Banning people from 

> voicing an opinion just gives these surpressed opinions credibility .

>  Its on a higher intellectual plain than merely yelling mindless abuse . 

> It's a question of open free debate and establishing the 

> truth..........rather then just deliberately offending people.


+++++++

I see. Hypocrisy and double standards are the yardsticks you use to classify 
"free speech."

I guess it means nothing in your fascist viewpoint that to a Jew who 
survived the holocaust the discussion of whether the holocaust actually 
happened is as offensive as the opinion that Muslims are colonizing Europe 
regardless of the language used.

T.B. 






_____________________________________________________________
Tired of the tired email address ?

click --->

http://www.ultimateemail.com/free-email-addresses.html