[kj] Lightbringer

Crack b.s.crack at generalmail.de
Sun Dec 3 10:23:43 EST 2006



It's entirely plausible that the Human species has accumulated all the
knowledge that we posses through development and learning . We ve
taken thousands of years to develop it and so therefore it isn't just
plausible , not even just possible, but more than likely to be
probable .
The question that's aways intrigued me is : How did the first
living thing come about? Even if we all descend from an Outer space
bacteria, where did that come from and how was it bought to life?
What bought life , when it previously did nt exist? Plants grow,
that can be explained , but how did living entity's come about?

Quoting god botherer <acroastic at hotmail.com>:


> Yes, it is entirely plausible that the theory of panspermia is correct. It

> is also entirely plausible that, in addition to this, a major intervention

> led to the sudden arrival of homo sapiens (as previous interventions had

> perhaps led to previous prototypes).

>

> Without such assistance, how much evolution is really possible between major

> cayaclysms?

>

> And when you consider all that we appear tp have learned, could it really

> have been possible to accumulate all the knowledge (e.g. concerning

> agriculture, metallurgy, astronomy, etc.) purely by observation, trial and

> error over very long periods of time?

>

> 'Light' has been 'brought' to humanity by some agent - not necessarily to be

> confused with God.

>

> All of this is plausible - and yet, if true, would still not mean there is

> no God.

>

>

> Si

>

>

>




More information about the Gathering mailing list