[kj] inerview's

[Cliff and Kara Livingston]

The thought that it may have been detonated was also a theory of the
oklahoma city bombing event.
Difficult to know what is the truth,but it's interesting to note what and
who has gained from these events.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Alexander Smith" <vassifer@earthlink.net>
To: <gathering@misera.net>; <gathering@misera.net>
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 10:34 AM
Subject: Re: [kj] interview


>
> Forgive me if I'm misinterpreting your post, Mark, but are you suggesting
> that the detonation that ultimately took the towers down *MAY NOT* have
been
> the result of the impact of the planes, but rather the result of some
> already-implanted hidden device within the towers prior to the planes
> hitting?
>
> I'm sorry, but that simply sounds ludicrous to me. I don't doubt the
results
> and how it all went down (pardon the dreadful pun) at all. It makes
perfect
> sense to me that planes with full fuel tanks could produce a fire hot
enough
> to collapse the buildings' respective infrastructures. Whether anyone in
the
> American corridors of power knew about it **ahead of time** is the real
> question. There have been numerous reports that there had been ample
warning
> that something was "on the way," but with no real specifics, they
> conceivably had no way of knowing.
>
> Ale xin NYC
>
>
>
> ----------
> >From: Mark Kolmar <mark@burningrome.com>
> >To: gathering@misera.net
> >Subject: Re: [kj] interview
> >Date: Fri, Jun 27, 2003, 11:36 AM
> >
>
> >> Hmmmm. Got to quibble with you there, Antoni. Word on the (Arab) street
> >> is that given Bin Laden's background as an accomplished engineer,
taking
> >> the towers all the way down in one fell swoop was part of the plan from
> >> the very beginning; not just to wound them, but to utterly destroy
them.
> >
> >I fully expect that had the towers not fallen on their own as a
> >consequence of the planes hitting, they would have needed to be imploded.
> >
> >The one bit of doubt that sits in the back of my mind regarding the
> >towers' collapse is this:  If we are considering conspiracy -- if only
> >perhaps in the form of taking advantage of an unexpected situation --
then
> >what might have happened after the planes hit and before the towers
> >collapsed?  Is it plausible that the towers (which would have been
> >imploded in any case due to the severe structural compromise at best)
were
> >imploded deliberately at that time?  I feel it would have had further
> >negative effect on the American psyche, had the towers been taken down at
> >a later date.  At least the trauma happened quickly.
> >
> >Study of footage of the collapse might or might not make clear whether
the
> >collapse could have been a controlled implosion.
> >
> >I do not wish to imply conspiracy here -- merely posing questions.
> >
> >--Mark
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >Gathering mailing list
> >Gathering@misera.net
> >http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
> _______________________________________________
> Gathering mailing list
> Gathering@misera.net
> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
>