[kj] interview

[Alexander Smith]

Forgive me if I'm misinterpreting your post, Mark, but are you suggesting
that the detonation that ultimately took the towers down *MAY NOT* have been
the result of the impact of the planes, but rather the result of some
already-implanted hidden device within the towers prior to the planes
hitting?

I'm sorry, but that simply sounds ludicrous to me. I don't doubt the results
and how it all went down (pardon the dreadful pun) at all. It makes perfect
sense to me that planes with full fuel tanks could produce a fire hot enough
to collapse the buildings' respective infrastructures. Whether anyone in the
American corridors of power knew about it **ahead of time** is the real
question. There have been numerous reports that there had been ample warning
that something was "on the way," but with no real specifics, they
conceivably had no way of knowing.

Ale xin NYC



----------
>From: Mark Kolmar <mark@burningrome.com>
>To: gathering@misera.net
>Subject: Re: [kj] interview
>Date: Fri, Jun 27, 2003, 11:36 AM
>

>> Hmmmm. Got to quibble with you there, Antoni. Word on the (Arab) street
>> is that given Bin Laden's background as an accomplished engineer, taking
>> the towers all the way down in one fell swoop was part of the plan from
>> the very beginning; not just to wound them, but to utterly destroy them.
>
>I fully expect that had the towers not fallen on their own as a
>consequence of the planes hitting, they would have needed to be imploded.
>
>The one bit of doubt that sits in the back of my mind regarding the
>towers' collapse is this:  If we are considering conspiracy -- if only
>perhaps in the form of taking advantage of an unexpected situation -- then
>what might have happened after the planes hit and before the towers
>collapsed?  Is it plausible that the towers (which would have been
>imploded in any case due to the severe structural compromise at best) were
>imploded deliberately at that time?  I feel it would have had further
>negative effect on the American psyche, had the towers been taken down at
>a later date.  At least the trauma happened quickly.
>
>Study of footage of the collapse might or might not make clear whether the
>collapse could have been a controlled implosion.
>
>I do not wish to imply conspiracy here -- merely posing questions.
>
>--Mark
>
>_______________________________________________
>Gathering mailing list
>Gathering@misera.net
>http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering