[Scons-users] Order of execution of a one-file builder

[Bill Deegan]

so installer, SharedLibrary, Program() builders would benefit? Anything
else?

On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 8:46 AM Javier Llopis <javier at llopis.me> wrote:

> Thank you so much!
>
> I don't think adding the signing functionality to the NSIS builder works
> for me because, in addition to the code I have shown, the build system
> creates a DLL and several different executables that should also be signed,
> not only the installer. I would like a more general purpose tool that can
> sign any eligible file I create and that is available for future projects.
>
> J
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From*: Mats Wichmann <mats at wichmann.us>
> *Sent*: 11/23/22 4:38 PM
> *To*: SCons users mailing list <scons-users at scons.org>, javier at llopis.me
> *Subject*: Re: [Scons-users] Order of execution of a one-file builder
> On 11/23/22 09:18, Bill Deegan wrote:
> > env.Sign = Action(....)
> >
> > But as I said earlier a better solution would be to change your
> > Installer builder to optionally do the signing Action.
>
> Or perhaps a bit more formally, use AddMethod() to add it - but I'll
> agree with Bill, don't add it if there's another, more direct, way.
>
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 23, 2022 at 4:25 AM Javier Llopis
> > > wrote:
> >
> > I'm exploring creating an Action instead of a builder. Is there any
> > way I can give a name to my Action, just like the built-in actions
> > "env.Chmod" or "env.Copy" have? If possible, I'd like my action to
> > be called "Sign", so the code would like AddPostAction(installer,
> > env.Sign)
> >
> > TIA
> > J
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-users mailing list
> Scons-users at scons.org
> https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist4.pair.net/pipermail/scons-users/attachments/20221123/f8ab6e38/attachment.htm>