[Scons-users] SCons documentation and google

[Bill Deegan]

Good to know.
Though  updating the old files would be challenging.
Anyone care to script that up for us.. ;)

On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 4:07 AM Max Vilimpoc <max at vilimpoc.org> wrote:

> One way to do it I believe is to set the latest documentation pages as
> the canonical reference, using <link> tags in the 0.97, 1.2, and 2.3.4
> pages, pointing them to the 3.1.2 documentation.
>
> https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/139066?hl=en
>
> This tells the crawler which page it should consider definitive for a
> certain search topic.
>
>
> On 2020-06-17 10:46, Julien Pommier wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is a minor issue, but every time I make some scons-related query
> > in google, the matches on the scons official website documentation
> > happen to be for random versions of scons, for example the first
> > google answer points to scons 0.97 , the second to scons 1.2 and the
> > third to scons 2.3.4 — I’m not sure what is the best practice for
> > handling that , but I guess even banning all non-latest docs in the
> > robots.txt would be better than the current situation !
> > _______________________________________________
> > Scons-users mailing list
> > Scons-users at scons.org
> > https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-users mailing list
> Scons-users at scons.org
> https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist4.pair.net/pipermail/scons-users/attachments/20200617/c37f8db0/attachment-0001.html>