[Scons-users] SCons not looking past first missing dependency to find additional missing dependencies

[Bill Deegan]

Why can't you move to 3.x?

Can you provide a small test case to demonstrate this issue?

On Wed, Feb 28, 2018 at 5:23 PM, Don Baldwin <donb at qti.qualcomm.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> Is there a way to have SCons find and report all of the missing
> dependencies for a target at once?
>
>
>
> We have a build where we’re getting an error like the following:
>
>
>
>                 scons: *** [foo.h] Explicit dependency `foo_1.xml' not
> found, needed by target `foo.h'.
>
>
>
> After we fix this error and rebuild, we get the following:
>
>
>
>                 scons: *** [foo.h] Explicit dependency `foo_2.xml' not
> found, needed by target `foo.h'.
>
>
>
> We’re already specifying -k on the command line, but that doesn’t seem to
> be working.
>
>
>
> We’re using version 2.0.0.final.0, which I know is pretty old.  We do
> have the option of moving to 2.5.1, if the behavior is different in that
> version, but we can’t move to 3.x.
>
>
>
> One of our guys did some digging, and found the following code in
> SCons/node/__init__.py:
>
>
>
>             for d in self.depends:
>
>                 if d.*missing*():
>
>                     msg = "Explicit dependency `%s' not found, needed by
> target `%s'."
>
>                     raise SCons.Errors.*StopError*(msg % (d, self))
>
>
>
> We looked in SCons version 2.5.1, and the code there looks identical, so I
> suspect that has the same behavior.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Don
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-users mailing list
> Scons-users at scons.org
> https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist4.pair.net/pipermail/scons-users/attachments/20180228/2ec42e9e/attachment.html>