[Scons-users] more Java scons3 issues...

Mats Wichmann mats at wichmann.us
Fri Dec 29 12:43:43 EST 2017


On 12/29/2017 12:47 AM, Daniel Moody wrote:
> Can you check out the changes from this pull request and see if it fixes
> your issue?
> 
> https://github.com/SCons/scons/pull/35

I will try this presently.  I was exploring something down this path
earlier with the same thinking.  My experiments indicated that the
conversion to File fails only if the string refers to an existing
directory (i.e. you still get a node even if the string does not refer
to an existing file), so while it looks likely to work for our case of
having a manifest file plus already-generated classfiles, it would
prevent the code from hitting the later part of the loop - lines 206 and
later in your patched version.  I don't have proof of that conjecture at
this point, and will update here when I get a chance to test.

> 
> On Dec 29, 2017 1:56 AM, "Daniel Moody" <dmoody256 at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hey Mats,
>>
>> I am looking into this issue, where does the MANIFEST.MF file exist at the
>> start of the build relative to the Scons file you mentioned above?
>>
>> What is your VariantDir call look like?
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 6:13 PM, Mats Wichmann <mats at wichmann.us> wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/16/2017 03:45 PM, Bill Deegan wrote:
>>>> Did you try the current head of the master branch?
>>>
>>> yes. I thought that was implied in part of my reply:
>>>
>>>>>  The post 3.0.1 jar.py
>>>>> changes help other problems I have, but not this one.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Scons-users mailing list
>>> Scons-users at scons.org
>>> https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
>>>
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-users mailing list
> Scons-users at scons.org
> https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
> 



More information about the Scons-users mailing list