[Scons-users] replacing ant with java

[Bill Deegan]

If there are multiple output files for this ant build, then you should
probably make a builder with an emitter so it can add more than one target.

-Bill

On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 6:40 AM, Pierre-Luc Boily <pierreluc.boily at gmail.com
> wrote:

> Thx for you answer William.  Bill, I will be glad to hear you on this one
> too.  It will help up to take the right decision, where to put our efforts
> =)
>
> Following Bill's comment, I refactored my SConscript,  see here
> <http://pastebin.com/yLycCK3K>  .  I have 2 questions :
>
> 1 - As source files, I added all files that are involve in the ant
> compilation.  Does that make sense?  Soon as a dev touch one of this file,
> scons detect that he needs to relaunch ant.
>
> 2 - I putted as target RulesEngine.jar but nobody used that target
> anywhere.
> In this case, is it better to let target empty, then I`ll have a simpler
> tree?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://scons.1086193.n5.
> nabble.com/replacing-ant-with-java-tp40648p40667.html
> Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-users mailing list
> Scons-users at scons.org
> https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist4.pair.net/pipermail/scons-users/attachments/20161024/8cc1eb65/attachment.html>