[Scons-users] Debian/Gentoo SCons 'recommendation'

[Bill Deegan]

William,

I agree.
It should be fairly simple to alleviate all those complaints with some
standard logic, and/or a boilerplate generator...
-Bill


On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 2:27 PM, William Blevins <wblevins001 at gmail.com>
wrote:

> It's complicated, but the main argument is that expect to interact with
> packages in an GNU Autotools specific sort of way; this is also why they
> discourage Waf while praising Make (but with emphasis on using autotools
> paradigms.
>
> We could probably work towards alleviating their opinion on this by making
> some sort of linux packaging wrapper.
>
> V/R,
> William
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 9:44 PM, Saša Janiška <gour at atmarama.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> just discovered this one:
>>
>> https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide#SCons
>>
>> and wonder why is it so?
>>
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> Gour
>>
>> --
>> Whenever and wherever there is a decline in religious practice,
>> O descendant of Bharata, and a predominant rise of irreligion —
>> at that time I descend Myself.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Scons-users mailing list
>> Scons-users at scons.org
>> https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-users mailing list
> Scons-users at scons.org
> https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist4.pair.net/pipermail/scons-users/attachments/20160111/24360693/attachment.html>