[Scons-users] Debian/Gentoo SCons 'recommendation'

William Blevins wblevins001 at gmail.com
Mon Jan 11 17:27:46 EST 2016


It's complicated, but the main argument is that expect to interact with
packages in an GNU Autotools specific sort of way; this is also why they
discourage Waf while praising Make (but with emphasis on using autotools
paradigms.

We could probably work towards alleviating their opinion on this by making
some sort of linux packaging wrapper.

V/R,
William

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 9:44 PM, Saša Janiška <gour at atmarama.com> wrote:

> Hello,
>
> just discovered this one:
>
> https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide#SCons
>
> and wonder why is it so?
>
>
> Sincerely,
> Gour
>
> --
> Whenever and wherever there is a decline in religious practice,
> O descendant of Bharata, and a predominant rise of irreligion —
> at that time I descend Myself.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-users mailing list
> Scons-users at scons.org
> https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist4.pair.net/pipermail/scons-users/attachments/20160111/650d7e25/attachment.html>


More information about the Scons-users mailing list