[Scons-users] Asciidoc sample chapter (was Re: Asidoc sample	chapter)
    Saša Janiška 
    gour at atmarama.com
       
    Mon Jan 11 04:16:15 EST 2016
    
    
  
On Pon, 2016-01-11 at 09:29 +0100, Dirk Bächle wrote:
> My appetite is (only) somewhat whettened. 
:-)
> I had a first look a the document, and all entities (like &SCons;) are
> gone and haven't bee retrieved correctly. I assume this is easy to
> fix? And I'm also missing the "scons_example" parts from the original
> document.
I'll take a closer look...probably those entities are included from
somewhere else and/or it's due to non-standard DoCBook?
> Yes, I agree. Please work on this some more, you'll have to provide a
> full replacement anyway...so better start with the critical 
> issues first.
Will do according my time constraints and I still have to decide between
SCons and CMake...
> Isn't AsciiDoctor written in Ruby? If yes, this would add another
> dependency to our toolchain...which might be tolerable but it's 
> certainly a point to discuss.
Yes, original AsciiDoc is Python, while AsciiDoctor (mostly compatible)
is Ruby, but with ~25x speedup.
Sincerely,
Gour
-- 
Everyone is forced to act helplessly according to the qualities 
he has acquired from the modes of material nature; therefore no 
one can refrain from doing something, not even for a moment.
    
    
More information about the Scons-users
mailing list