[Scons-users] Why SCons is not slow

[William Blevins]

On Thu, Jan 7, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Saša Janiška <gour at atmarama.com> wrote:

> On Čet, 2016-01-07 at 17:01 +0000, William Blevins wrote:
>
> > All large systems eventually run into scalability problems. SCons
> > handles dependencies as accurately as possible,
>
> That's one of SCons features I highly appreciate!
>
> > The stub-wrapper is still in the works, but the memory optimizations
> > have been completed and are available in the latest distribution.
> > Once the stub-process wrapper is complete, I think all the planned
> > performance improvements will be complete.
>
> That's "Integrating stubprocess.py wrapper for speedup" which is
> supposed to be done for 2.5, according to roadmap?
>
>
>
> > Python 3 support is still incomplete, but there is an effort to make
> > the current baseline Python 3 compatible.
>
> What does it mean?
>

Python 3 support is a work in progress, but there is not an explicit ETA.


>
> > https://bitbucket.org/scons/scons/wiki/SconsVsOtherBuildTools
>
> I know about it, but thought it is old stuff, although I now see it's
> updated on 2015-10-14.
>

It is old; we migrated to Bitbucket wiki last year so the date isn't quite
right :)


>
>
> Sincerely,
> Gour
>
> --
> He who is regulated in his habits of eating, sleeping, recreation
> and work can mitigate all material pains by practicing the yoga system.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-users mailing list
> Scons-users at scons.org
> https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist4.pair.net/pipermail/scons-users/attachments/20160107/6a3cb296/attachment.html>