[Scons-users] Would requiring Python 2.7.4 or above be a problem for future release?

William Blevins wblevins001 at gmail.com
Thu Nov 19 04:57:58 EST 2015


On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 7:50 AM, Russel Winder <russel at winder.org.uk> wrote:

> On Wed, 2015-11-18 at 20:23 +0000, William Blevins wrote:
> > If we are requiring 2.7.X anyway, I don't think this is
> > unreasonable.  Due
> > to the OpenSSL issue resolved in 2.7.8, most users are probably using
> > latest for security reasons regardless.
>
> The higher the version of 2.7.x we can require, the easier it will be
> to make a single code base Python 2 and Python 3 compliant. (More and
> more stuff gets back ported to Python 2.7.x, so the higher the version
> the more 3 stuff there is.)
>
> I think we also need to say Pythons 3.0, 3.1 and 3.2 will *not* be
> supported.
>

Ditto with this logic.


>
> --
> Russel.
>
> =============================================================================
> Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip:
> sip:russel.winder at ekiga.net
> 41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel at winder.org.uk
> London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-users mailing list
> Scons-users at scons.org
> https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist4.pair.net/pipermail/scons-users/attachments/20151119/b0265ee8/attachment.html>


More information about the Scons-users mailing list