[Scons-users] Fwd: Cleaning only certain built objects
Jean Duthon
duthon.jean at gmail.com
Fri Nov 14 10:16:18 EST 2014
Sorry for not being clear at first.
I was afraid of that answer but thought it was that way...
The bad thing is that I could not run a full scons --Test which build the
lib if it does not exist.
In fact we are also building samples which are lib-dependent.
Thank you very much Dirk for your quick and complete answers.
Best regards,
Jean.
2014-11-14 16:09 GMT+01:00 Dirk Bächle <tshortik at gmx.de>:
> Jean,
>
> On 14.11.2014 15:45, Jean Duthon wrote:
>
>> Hello Dirk,
>>
>> The problem is that to run tests, I need to build a lib.
>> And I would like to be able to clean the tests, without cleaning the lib.
>>
>> thanks for the clarification, it wasn't that obvious to me that your
> libs are real dependencies to your test executables. In that case, SCons is
> doing what is usually expected...and deliberately breaking its default
> behaviour is a bad thing, and means a lot of work. ;)
>
> One could raise the question "Why do you want to delete the test
> applications at all?". My guess is that you're trying to enforce a re-run
> of all tests...even if no sources/libs have changed. Is that correct? If
> so, a better approach would be to have different SConstructs for the
> sources/libs and the tests themselves.
> Like this, the "test" SConstructs see the libs as simple source files, so
> they won't get removed on a "scons -f SConstruct.test -c".
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Dirk
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-users mailing list
> Scons-users at scons.org
> https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist4.pair.net/pipermail/scons-users/attachments/20141114/9a0c2b72/attachment.html>
More information about the Scons-users
mailing list