[Scons-users] Caching compiler side effects?
Bill Deegan
bill at baddogconsulting.com
Sun Jun 1 22:00:37 EDT 2014
Andrew,
Likely you need the emitter to add it as an output file.
SideEffect files are assumed to be "unimportant" and likely that's why they
are not cached.
SideEffect() is just meant to notify scons that "hey there's this other
file being output by this step, please be aware and among other thing don't
run steps which also produce this file at the same time.."
-Bill
On Sun, Jun 1, 2014 at 4:42 PM, Andrew C. Morrow <andrew.c.morrow at gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> This was asked long ago on SO but never had a satisfactory reply:
>
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3633542/scons-how-to-put-multiple-output-files-in-cache
>
> I'm finding myself in the same situation. In some situations my C++
> compiler emits an extra file along with the .o. I've declared the extra
> file as a SideEffect, I believe correctly, but it does not appear to be
> populated into the CacheDir, and therefore it is not copied back out when
> the associated .o is retrieved from the cache.
>
> How can I inform SCons that I want the extra file cached?
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-users mailing list
> Scons-users at scons.org
> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/scons-users/attachments/20140601/3a7e0411/attachment.html>
More information about the Scons-users
mailing list