[Scons-users] [Scons-dev] Corrupt cache?

[Gary Oberbrunner]

[Tom, this is probably more of a scons-users at scons.org question; moving to
that list. -- Gary]

SCons can warn if it can't copy something to the cache, if you turn on
--warn=cache-write-error (it's off by default).  Unless you're doing
something unusual with deciders or custom signatures, I don't see how it
could store different objects under the same cache filename though -- see
CacheDir.py:cachepath().  If it's repeatable, you can probably learn more
by going into CacheDir.py and setting cache_debug to a filename or "-" for
stdout.

-- Gary


On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 5:39 AM, Tom Tanner (BLOOMBERG/ LONDON) <
ttanner2 at bloomberg.net> wrote:


> I've recently had a problem with some object being copied to the cache

> *but* the copy didn't happen because the target thing already existed, but

> the new object and old object had different md5sums. Not surprisingly this

> causes very strange problems when the files get copied from the cache.

>

> I'm not sure how to identify what on earth is causing this, and how to

> trigger a warning if it happens (either on copying to or copying from), as

> it's a bit of a disaster.

> _______________________________________________

> Scons-dev mailing list

> Scons-dev at scons.org

> http://two.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev

>




-- 
Gary
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/scons-users/attachments/20130517/5ba239bd/attachment.htm>