[Scons-users] Segmentation faults in scons-2.2.0

[Chris Irvine]

$ python --version

Python 2.6.2

 

The core can be looked at with that "gbd python core" command.  Thanks.  It
shows the three warnings below and they are repeated numerous times, always
as warnings. 

 

This GDB was configured as "i586-pc-interix3"...

Core was generated by `python /usr/local/bin/scons -H'.

Reading symbols from /usr/lib/x86/libdl.so.5.2...done.

Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/x86/libdl.so.5.2

Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/x86/libreadline.so...

warning: "_environ": indirect symbol does not have real one (-1)

 

 

warning: "_RaiseException at 16": indirect symbol does not have real one (-1)

 

 

warning: "_beThreadSafe": indirect symbol does not have real one (-1)

 

done.

 

 

My system is Interix 6.1 and 64 bit system.  Microsoft regard Interix as
third-party software now.  The Microsoft link about vfork you had is for
Interix 3 and written back in 2005.  I hope it has been fixed??  In the
python makefile, it has  

 

MACHDEP=   interix6

 

The configuration may be the culprit.  

 

 

Cheers

--Chris

 

From: scons-users-bounces at scons.org [mailto:scons-users-bounces at scons.org]
On Behalf Of Bill Deegan
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 7:34 PM
To: SCons users mailing list
Subject: Re: [Scons-users] Segmentation faults in scons-2.2.0

 

Try :
python --version

?

-Bill

 

On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 6:27 PM, Gary Oberbrunner <garyo at oberbrunner.com>
wrote:

 

 

On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 9:07 PM, Chris Irvine <cirvine1 at telus.net> wrote:

...

Memory fault (core dumped)

$ scons

Memory fault (core dumped)

$ scons --debug=pdb

Memory fault (core dumped)

 

 

I don't know anything about Interix -- does Microsoft even still support it?
If it's Unix-like enough, you can try to do

  gdb python core

and then type 'where' to see the stack trace. But that will be at too low a
level to see what python was trying to do at the time of failure.  And your
log above shows it might not even be writing the core files it says it is.

I suppose it could be this issue: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/328684
Might be worth trying that patch anyway.

 

Does python work at all?

 

-- 
Gary 


_______________________________________________
Scons-users mailing list
Scons-users at scons.org
http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/scons-users/attachments/20130816/9e63a8f1/attachment.htm