[Scons-users] Scons using config.h.in
Mark A. Flacy
mflacy at verizon.net
Mon Apr 1 18:00:58 EDT 2013
Zachary Lund <admin at computerquip.com> wrote:
>On Sun, 2013-03-31 at 17:15 +0200, Marc Joliet wrote:
>> Am Sat, 30 Mar 2013 00:10:32 -0500
>> schrieb Zachary Lund <admin at computerquip.com>:
>>
>> >
>> > I cannot seem to be able to find a reasonable method of using an
>> > "outside" config. In autoconf, it's popular to have a "config.h.in"
>or
>> > similar to import static source. Autoconf automatically expects a
>.in
>> > file while scons doesn't seem to want to allow anything of the sort
>with
>> > ease.
>> >
>> > Any chance I'm missing something? If not, would such a feature be
>> > allowed in Scons?
>>
>> Since nobody else replied yet:
>>
>> I don't really know much of anything about autoconf, and hence what
>exactly
>> you're looking for, but maybe env.Substfile (see the scons man page)
>can do
>> what you want?
>>
>> HTH
>> _______________________________________________
>> Scons-users mailing list
>> Scons-users at scons.org
>> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
>
>Herm... I suppose the autoconf macro 'AC_CONFIG_HEADERS' functionality
>is what I'm looking for. You specify a header and it automatically
>looks
>for a corresponding '<header>.in' to use as a template.
>
>Scons cannot do anything in thie config header outside of macro
>definitions and even then its limited. Allowing the use of a template
>header by default would ease the pain of both moving from Autoconf to
>Scons and using scons in general.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Scons-users mailing list
>Scons-users at scons.org
>http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
Perhaps an example of what you really want to do that isn't supported easily by scons would help. Namely, how does having a template file solve your problem?
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
More information about the Scons-users
mailing list