[kj] (OT) Dangerous Dancing?

sade1 saulomar1 at yahoo.com
Mon May 30 23:00:26 EDT 2011

So, intimidation is.. not so bad? We should be grateful that however things
turn out, that we will never be as bad as Iran(?)

From: Jim Harper <jimharper666 at yahoo.co.uk>
To: A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!) <gathering at misera.net>
Sent: Mon, May 30, 2011 3:02:54 PM
Subject: Re: [kj] (OT) Dangerous Dancing?

'Intimidation' is a lot better than the treatment others get at the hands of
actual armies of occupation and less restrained police forces around the globe.
I'd imagine there are plenty of people in, say, Iran who would relish the chance
to get carted off to waste a few hours in a cell before being released largely

As for keeping people in check, it's obviously not working. As demonstrated,
youtube's full of people exercising their right to be 'unchecked' before telling
the entire world about it. I don't see many of them becoming reluctant to open
their mouths in future or resolving to stay 'off the radar' from now on. In
fact, there are plenty who appear to make a living (or at least a reputation)
from not being 'checked'.


--- On Mon, 30/5/11, GREG SLAWSON <gregslawson at msn.com> wrote:

They are truly an army of occupation and intimidation designed to keep people in


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/gathering/attachments/20110530/7467110c/attachment.html>

More information about the Gathering mailing list