[kj] OT: BNP on Question Time

[Rob Horan]

What it exposed was Griffin's inability to put his message across as a consummate politician, this was his big chance in the public eye, he looked unsure and frozen by the spotlight - surely he needs to be able to deal with 100 hostile accusors in a television studio....the problem is that BNP support is disaffected working class in high unemployment and multicultural areas and a proportion of them will search for something/one to blame for their woes, the BNP feeds off this of course.

In the end I thought he was a nonsense, the BNP is a century out of date and his supporters were exposed as fools.....   

-----Original Message-----
From: gathering-bounces at misera.net [mailto:gathering-bounces at misera.net] On Behalf Of iPat
Sent: 23 October 2009 12:53
To: A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!)
Subject: Re: [kj] OT: BNP on Question Time

ill differ
the person attracted to the BNP is someone who has lost all respect for teh status quo in politics and will have seen this as an example of a collusion via the BBC to hound and persecute him for standing up for white British people.

Question Time is the top political q&a programme, where politicians answer questions about the current policies/news.
Given that there is a Rotyal Mail strike on, how come no-one asked about that? Because it was set up to belittle Griffen.

On other matters Dimberly did take to task the conservative and labour politician once the programme moved on so some semblance of fairness might be seen. If it was charachter assasination any other political programme could have done that and I think that the Question Time brand will suffer now because of this ratings grabbing stunt.

So the person who might vote for the BNP will actually see this as an orchestrated campaign by X aginst the ordinary British working person.
X could be Jews, the establishment, commies etc. It will merely underline their siege mentality.

All in all, it spoke in a way to the audiences who wanted to hear what they wanted to hear.


On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:32 AM,  <jpwhkj at aol.com> wrote:

> I wasn't going to watch, 'cos I figured it would be tedious, but then 

> did.... and it was a hoot.  Griffin is obviously intelligent (in a 

> rather narrow way), but he mostly looked like a complete prick.  If 

> politics was always so entertaining, people would be way more engaged with it.

--
iPat
Ascendo tuum - Up yours
_______________________________________________
Gathering mailing list
Gathering at misera.net
http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering