[kj] ot Crass

[iPat]

not bad
sustainability was the living example
Someone claiming they own your songs and taking money without your
knowledge is theft. Being your pal and drinking the odd pint every now
and then in your company knowing you were stealing from your pal is
just dishonest and i doubt you would choose to remain friends with
anyone who did the same to you.

Crass never said that you didnt need money, they just said there were
many different choices to the ones being offerred at the time

Mansion garden in Epping is a cheap shot and if you actually knew
where Ignorant lived you wouldn't have made the comment. But i know
your playing a game, long may you continue doing so.

On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Floren Luke <fluke1 at live.co.uk> wrote:

> That may be so, but Crass had other ways of financing their lives, after all

> we all need money to live .

> Even if people dont agree with Capitalism, they still need money to survive

> .

>   Igs could fuck about with his Punch and Judy, whilst Colin would have had

> to gone back to his Painting and decorating job . Igs could grow vegetables

> in his mansion garden in Epping forest, whilst Colin couldnt even grow

> enough food to feed Posh Spice  on his high rise  apartment balcony in

>  Depford

>    I dont feel that its hypocritical to make a living wage out of music , it

> would be different if they had an anti capitalist message and then charged

> the going rate for gigs and merchandise , but Conflict didnt make huge

> profits and they kept their prices below what is considered to be the normal

> asking price .

>


-- 
iPat
Ascendo tuum - Up yours