[kj] FW: Michael Jackson dead
Jim Harper
jimharper666 at yahoo.co.uk
Mon Jun 29 10:44:24 EDT 2009
I might take the money if the police/district attorney refused to pursue the matter through the criminal courts; after all, it was all very his-word-against-the-other, with not a great deal of evidence either way, the kind of case the police/DA are wary of taking on even without a megacelebrity involved. Getting a case through the civil courts is easier than a criminal trial, because the burden of evidence is lower. It worked with OJ. Besides, if taking the money suggests the kids and their parents are lying through their teeth, offering them money (as opposed to definitively trying to prove his innocence) suggests Jackson was guilty.
--- On Mon, 29/6/09, ade <ade at the-lab.zetnet.co.uk> wrote:
I mean, if he fucked YOUR
kids, wouldn't you want to kick his face in until it was nothing more than mince & tiny bits of plastic?
If you managed to stop yourself from doing that, wouldn't you persue him relentlessly through the courts?
Or would you just take a pay-off & be the money-grubbing scumbag you always were?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/gathering/attachments/20090629/15ddf76b/attachment.htm>
More information about the Gathering
mailing list