[kj] Snopes.com new entry on Sarah Palin library book ban

[Brendan]

Actually if you follow the logic of what I said, technically I AM calling
Americans thick (a=b and b=c, therefore a=c)...but you know what I mean.

Otherwise you're too thick to work it out anyway ;)

PS: The Large Hardon Collider has been turned on and we're all alive! I
managed to get in a panicwank when someone reminded me it was T minus 10
mins ;)


> Correct, religiosity is extremely high in the US and from what I remember

> it's also correlated with being thick. Can try to dredge the link up if

> anyone is interested.

>

> Oh and I'm not calling Americans thick mind, rather religious

> fundamentalists.

>

>>> Outside f many fanatical Mid Easern religious states I cannot think of

>>> a

>>> place where such an idea would get serious political tracttion.

>>  

>>   Almost eerie you say that, cuz the U.S. was recently ranked as the

>> most

>> religiously fundamentalist state on Earth, outside of the muslim world.

>>

>>

>>  

>> From: "B. Oliver Sheppard" <bigblackhair at sbcglobal.net>

>> To: "A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!)"

>> <gathering at misera.net>

>> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 12:10 PM

>> Subject: Re: [kj] Snopes.com new entry on Sarah Palin library book ban

>>

>>

>>> It's an embarrassing reflection of American political culture that

>>> Snopes.com also has put up a new entry debunking a widely-circulated

>>> email

>>

>>> that says Obama literally fits the description of the Anti-Christ from

>>> the

>>

>>> Bible! That this idea is even seriously entertained is such a poor

>>> reflection on our country.

>>>

>>> Outside f many fanatical Mid Easern religious states I cannot think of

>>> a

>>> place where such an idea would get serious political tracttion.

>>>

>>> But, alas, Snopes.com says Obama=anti-Christ rumor is false:

>>>

>>> http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/antichrist.asp

>>>

>>> Haha

>>>

>>> -Oliver

>>>

>>> Karen Weil wrote:

>>>> *Oliver:*

>>>> Thanks for sending this. I never really bought into that (although it

>>>> does give one pause that there was even discussion of this topic). I

>>>> still don't think much of this woman, and feel she is not

>> qualified to be

>>>> VP,  but fair is fair.

>>>> Can we just hold the election today and get this whole f-ing ordeal

>> over

>>>> with? ; )

>>>>  Best,

>>>>  k.w.

>>>>  -

>>>

>>> _______________________________________________

>>> Gathering mailing list

>>> Gathering at misera.net

>>> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

>>>

>>

>> _______________________________________________

>> Gathering mailing list

>> Gathering at misera.net

>> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

>>

>>

>>

>>       _______________________________________________

>> Gathering mailing list

>> Gathering at misera.net

>> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

>>

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> Gathering mailing list

> Gathering at misera.net

> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

>