[kj] OT - List of books Sarah Palin wanted banned

[cliffmonka at alaska.net]

the next person to disagree and stand up with an opinion,get's it up the bum from
Sarah ImPalin with a horse sized strap on.



> The point is that they're as bad as each other mate.

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: gathering-bounces at misera.net [mailto:gathering-bounces at misera.net]On Behalf

> Of Alexander Smith

> Sent: 07 September 2008 17:15

> To: A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!)

> Subject: Re: [kj] OT - List of books Sarah Palin wanted banned

>

>

>

> " I find it sad that the people who claim to be "liberal" would go and shut down

> and shout down anyone who doesn't agree with them."

>

>

> What exactly do you think the Right/Conservative/Republicans are doing? Sitting

> quietly with the fingers entwined?

>

>

> Alex in NYC

>

>

> On Sep 7, 2008, at 8:28 AM, ade wrote:

>

>

>>Though in all honesty... I think it goes beyond republican/democrat left/right. I

>> was always pro free speech & transparency. I find it sad that the people who claim

>> to be "liberal" would go and shut down and shout down anyone who doesn't agree

>> with them.

>

> Spot-on. This is the truth of free speech - the chosen 'enemy' should have as much

> right to spout their utterances as the chosen 'heroes'.

>

> Sadly, this is how Hitler got in.

>

> Back when the Greeks began voting, at the dawn of democracy (lol), did they not

> vote for war time & time again?

>

>

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: gathering-bounces at misera.net [ mailto:gathering-bounces at misera.net]On Behalf

> Of The Exorcist

> Sent: 07 September 2008 00:26

> To: A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!)

> Subject: Re: [kj] OT - List of books Sarah Palin wanted banned

>

>

> I guess some things can't be explained ehhh? LOL (Also a big SWANS fan amongst many

> many other bands.

> Music and books are my life. I guess I just enjoy and can understand and relate to

> free expression in its many

> various forms.)

>

> Though in all honesty... I think it goes beyond republican/democrat left/right.

>

> I was always pro free speech & transparency. I find it sad that the people who

> claim to be "liberal" would

> go and shut down and shout down anyone who doesn't agree with them.

>

> (How many times have you seen a right wing or conservative speaker being shouted

> down by lefties when invited

> to speak at a University?) When people feel the need to disrupt someone's speech

> (Code Pink at the RNC?).

>

> I understand that people are different and I respect it. I don't force my views on

> anyone and am more than willing

> to agree to disagree. More importantly, I will always fight and support free Speech

> no matter to whom it applies!

>

> Cheers,

> Me

>

> Have a great weekend and hope the rain is gone by tomorrow.

>

>

> At 07:02 PM 9/6/2008, Alexander Smith wrote:

>

>

> It always amazes me how Yos the Exorcist can be such a die-hard Republican and a

> die-hard Killing Joke fan at the same time. To my mind, they cancel each other out

> -- but then, I'm a proudly liberal lefty and still a Kiss fan, so I guess it's the

> same contradiction.

>

> Alex in NYC

>

>

>

> On Sep 6, 2008, at 6:52 PM, The Exorcist wrote:

>

>

>

> Yeah, just like saying that it wasn't her child but her daughters. Truth doesn't

> matter. All you

> have to do is talk shit and make enough of a ruckus that people believe it.

>

> Speaking on the banning of things and restriction of free speech let's look at Sir

> Obama's record.

>

> http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0808/12816.html

> Sen. Barack Obama has launched an all-out effort to block a Republican

> billionaire’s efforts to tie him

> to domestic and foreign terrorists in a wave of negative television ads.

>

> Obama’s campaign has written the Department of Justice demanding a criminal

> investigation of the “American Issues Project,”

> the vehicle through which Dallas investor Harold Simmons is financing the

> advertisements. The Obama campaign — and tens

> of thousands of supporters — also is pressuring television networks and affiliates

> to reject the ads.

>

> OR...

> http://www.swamppolitics.com/news/politics/blog/2008/08/obama_campaign_confronts_wgn_r.html

> (the above link is just a small snippet... there are much more detailed ones out

> there)

>

> The fact that Obama tried to have Stanley Kurtz thrown off the air for talking

> about the "Chicago Annenberg Challenge".

>

> "The magazine had been blocked in its initial attempts to obtain records from the

> University of Illinois at Chicago regarding

> a school reform initiative called the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, which Obama

> chaired and Ayers co-founded.

>

> Obama critics were quick to suggest that political clout could be involved in

> seeking to protect Obama from embarrassment.

> The school later reserved its position and made the records available Tuesday."

>

> So first they have the University block access to the files. Then they threaten,

> flood and go after the radio station that will give Stanley

> a stage to talk at. BRAVO!!! Way to go!

>

> At least the Radio station offered the Obama campaign to come on the show to

> discuss/refute what Stanley says (The Obama

> campaign declined.

>

> The ones throwing shit at Palin don't provide that opportunity. While Stanley Kurtz

> and the Ad campaign (correct or incorrect)

> stated info based on Obama's past associations the shit thrown at Palin is pulled

> out of thin air.

>

> Funny thing is, Palin isn't running to the DOJ or sending out mass Emails telling

> people to wreak havoc.

>

> Sincerely,

> Me

>

>

> At 05:12 PM 9/6/2008, fluke fluke wrote:

>

>

> I dont see how you can judge a person  on the basis of when they first got their

> passport .

> Also she didn't ban any books  whilst she was Mayor she just ............

>

> "Palin herself, questioned at the time, called her inquiries rhetorical and simply

> part of a policy discussion with a department head "about understanding and

> following administration agendas," according to the Frontiersman article."

>

>    I abhor these Left Wing smear campaigns, they are dishonest , deceitful and they

> distort the democratic process .

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

>> From: vassifer at earthlink.net

>> To: gathering at misera.net

>> Date: Sat, 6 Sep 2008 16:57:34 -0400

>> Subject: Re: [kj] OT - List of books Sarah Palin wanted banned

>>

>>

>> Like I said, it certainly fits her profile, though I'd be damn

>> surprised if she's even HEART of HALF of these books (woman didn't get

>> her first passport until 2007, for cryin' out loud).

>>

>> More to the point though: Regardless of title, the banning of ANY book

>> is completely fucked up.

>>

>> May she rot.

>>

>> Alex in NYC

>>

>>

>>

>> On Sep 6, 2008, at 4:22 PM, B. Oliver Sheppard wrote:

>>

>> > Wow, I know she had some deal with the library, and I hate this

>> > evil, hypocritical version of Tina Fey, but is that list accurate. I

>> > mean, LYSISTRATA? Banned?

>> >

>> > Part of me wouldn't doubt it -- but part of me insists on a

>> > snopes.com check.

>> >

>> > -Oliver

>> >

>> > LONESTYLE at aol.com wrote:

>> >> Check this one out...

>> >> ~LB

>> >>

>> >

>> > _______________________________________________

>> > Gathering mailing list

>> > Gathering at misera.net

>> > http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

>>

>> _______________________________________________

>> Gathering mailing list

>> Gathering at misera.net

>> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

>

>

>

>   _____

>

> Try Facebook in Windows Live Messenger! Try it

> <http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/111354030/direct/01/> Now!

> _______________________________________________

> Gathering mailing list

> Gathering at misera.net

> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

>

>

> Competition is a barbaric, insensitive ritual that reeks of social Darwinism.

> We cannot allow the fittest to survive on our pages. Your loss is someone

> else's gain, and your gain is someone else's loss. Therefore, losers contribute

> to the society and winners take away from it. Being a winner is unethical, while

> a society of losers is happy and striving as a collective. In the spirit of

> diversity,

> inclusiveness, and collectivism our contests shall have no winners.

> Everyone is declared a loser, which in our book means an ethical team player.

> _______________________________________________

> Gathering mailing list

> Gathering at misera.net

> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> Gathering mailing list

> Gathering at misera.net

> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

>

> Competition is a barbaric, insensitive ritual that reeks of social Darwinism.

> We cannot allow the fittest to survive on our pages. Your loss is someone

> else's gain, and your gain is someone else's loss. Therefore, losers contribute

> to the society and winners take away from it. Being a winner is unethical, while

> a society of losers is happy and striving as a collective. In the spirit of

> diversity,

> inclusiveness, and collectivism our contests shall have no winners.

> Everyone is declared a loser, which in our book means an ethical team player.

>

> _______________________________________________

> Gathering mailing list

> Gathering at misera.net

> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

>

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> Gathering mailing list

> Gathering at misera.net

> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

>