[kj] palin ban

[Alexander Smith]

As far as I'm concerned, there is no difference between wanting to  
impose creationism in schools and merely wanting to have it "taught  
alongside" conventional scientific study for the sake of "healthy  
debate." Creationism has no place in schools in any capacity. Full stop.

I'm not worried about Sarah Palin banning KJ discs (Killing Joke  
should be so lucky to garner such publicity). I'm just fucking sick of  
right wing, Pro-life, Bible-bangin', gun-carrying wing nuts and their  
bullshit agenda. It begins and ends there.

Alex in NYC


On Sep 7, 2008, at 12:01 AM, The Exorcist wrote:


> Just like she did NOT ban any books nor did she try to IMPOSE  

> creationism in classes

> I think it's quite fair to state that she would NOT ban KJ related  

> stuff. If this is the most

> extreme stuff that you think exists you need to do a tad more reading.

>

> It's nice to make presumptions based on no facts but reaching for  

> straws gets tiresome

> after a while does it not?

>

>

> At 08:33 PM 9/6/2008, fluw wrote:

>> how many people on the gathering doubt if sarah palin were to  

>> become aware of killing joke cd's or, (haha finally) a jaz coleman  

>> book in a library, she would not have them banned?

>>

>> as a killing joke fan, would you be apposed to this banning?

>>

>> as your nations VP and following a very likely health failure from  

>> Mc Cain, she would then be your president and the most powerful  

>> nutcase in the world, are you comfortable with her decision making?

>>

>> or would you rather she just go back to running cliff's state like  

>> a despot on a runaway train and get with a proper sex reassignment  

>> surgery and promptly get on with giving her twin wynona judd a  

>> stiff ass to mouth?

>>

>> i vote for giving it to wynona

>> _______________________________________________

>> Gathering mailing list

>> Gathering at misera.net

>> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

>

> Competition is a barbaric, insensitive ritual that reeks of social  

> Darwinism.

> We cannot allow the fittest to survive on our pages. Your loss is  

> someone

> else's gain, and your gain is someone else's loss. Therefore, losers  

> contribute

> to the society and winners take away from it. Being a winner is  

> unethical, while

> a society of losers is happy and striving as a collective. In the  

> spirit of diversity,

> inclusiveness, and collectivism our contests shall have no winners.

> Everyone is declared a loser, which in our book means an ethical  

> team player.

>

> _______________________________________________

> Gathering mailing list

> Gathering at misera.net

> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/gathering/attachments/20080907/fa04187e/attachment.html>