[kj] palin ban

[The Exorcist]

Just like she did NOT ban any books nor did she try to IMPOSE 
creationism in classes
I think it's quite fair to state that she would NOT ban KJ related 
stuff. If this is the most
extreme stuff that you think exists you need to do a tad more reading.

It's nice to make presumptions based on no facts but reaching for 
straws gets tiresome
after a while does it not?


At 08:33 PM 9/6/2008, fluw wrote:

>how many people on the gathering doubt if sarah palin were to become 

>aware of killing joke cd's or, (haha finally) a jaz coleman book in 

>a library, she would not have them banned?

>

>as a killing joke fan, would you be apposed to this banning?

>

>as your nations VP and following a very likely health failure from 

>Mc Cain, she would then be your president and the most powerful 

>nutcase in the world, are you comfortable with her decision making?

>

>or would you rather she just go back to running cliff's state like a 

>despot on a runaway train and get with a proper sex reassignment 

>surgery and promptly get on with giving her twin wynona judd a stiff 

>ass to mouth?

>

>i vote for giving it to wynona

>_______________________________________________

>Gathering mailing list

>Gathering at misera.net

>http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering


Competition is a barbaric, insensitive ritual that reeks of social Darwinism.
We cannot allow the fittest to survive on our pages. Your loss is someone
else's gain, and your gain is someone else's loss. Therefore, losers contribute
to the society and winners take away from it. Being a winner is 
unethical, while
a society of losers is happy and striving as a collective. In the 
spirit of diversity,
inclusiveness, and collectivism our contests shall have no winners.
Everyone is declared a loser, which in our book means an ethical team player.  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/gathering/attachments/20080907/229fb154/attachment.htm>