[kj] Congrats Obama

[Karen Weil]

OK, I GET IT!

TOT ZIENS ...

K.W.
THE STATES
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Brendan" <bq at soundgardener.co.nz>
To: "A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!)" 
<gathering at misera.net>
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 5:09 PM
Subject: Re: [kj] Congrats Obama


HEY WE'RE EMAILING FROM A LONG WAY AWAY!

TSCHüSSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

;p


> Bongo:

>

> Sorry, but I don't buy into your theories, either.

> AND NO NEED TO TYPE IN ALL CAPS!

> k.w.

>   ----- Original Message -----

>   From: The Exorcist

>   To: A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!)

>   Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 4:42 PM

>   Subject: Re: [kj] Congrats Obama

>

>

>   Need more water for the Kool-Aid? :)

>

>   Cheers,

>   Me

>

>   At 05:42 PM 6/4/2008, bongo wrote:

>

>     you really think Osama (rhymes with Obama) attacked the US???

>     have you not seen LOOSE CHANGE? IN PLANE SIGHT? or any of the other

> 911 doco's?

>     there is NO WAY that all that was done by foreign darkies... it was

>     your LEADERS!!!

>

>     WAKE UP!

>

>     YOU'RE (WE'RE) ALL FUCKED!!!

>

>

>     =)

>

>

>

>     On Thu, Jun 5, 2008 at 9:06 AM, B. Oliver Sheppard

>     <bigblackhair at sbcglobal.net> wrote:

>     > Yeah, Saddam was a thug, but a secular thug, not a religious zealot

> or

>     > Jihadist. he likened himself more to Stalin than to any sort of holy

>     > warrior, and thrugh his heavy hand prevented what the US invasion

> unleashed.

>     > In fact, most will probably remember Saddam's right-hand man Tariq

> Aziz was

>     > a Catholic, not even a Muslim.

>     >

>     > Bin laden and Saddam were at sword points. Bin Laden wanted the

> ungodly

>     > secular regime of Saddam destroyed so that he and his zealots could

> restore

>     > the historic Islamic caliphate to the country. Everyone always asked

> "Why

>     > did bin laden attack the US? What does he want/ WHAT DOES HE WANT?"

> When bn

>     > Laden qute clearly announced in message after message what his

> demands were.

>     > These were and are readily available, translated into English, and

> newspaper

>     > printed them.

>     >

>     > People in the US apparently did read them, because they preferred to

> think

>     > bin Laden jst "hated freedom" or something. In fact, bin Laden's 3

> demands

>     > were 1) removal of US bases from Saudi Arabia [which he got, so

> that's one

>     > for Osama] 2) end of US support for Israel, and 3) restoration of

> Islamic

>     > caliphate to its historic place in Baghdad. Bin Laden has one out of

> 3 of

>     > these already, and he's closer to getting the 3rd one now than he

> was when

>     > Hussein kept bin Laden's group, as well as the Kurds and others,

> suppressed.

>     >

>     > Now that Turkey, a US ally, is suppressing the Kurds, it's okay. But

> Saddam

>     > doing it? What an evil man.

>     >

>     > -Oliver

>     >

>     > ade wrote:

>     >>

>     >> You know, Saddam was already dealing with religious unrest,

> bombings,

>     >> etc, on his own soil. The ironic outcome being that he was much

> nearer to

>     >> being on 'our' side when it came to Islamist nutfucks terrorising.

> Whereas

>     >> the void will now be filled by well established battle-hardened

> Islamist

>     >> nutfucks. We've trained them up...

>     >>

>     >>

>     >

>     > _______________________________________________

>     > Gathering mailing list

>     > Gathering at misera.net

>     > http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

>     >

>

>

>

>     --

>

>

>     "due to a lack of trained trumpeters, the end of the world has been

>     postponed indefinitely..."

>     _______________________________________________

>     Gathering mailing list

>     Gathering at misera.net

>     http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

>   Competition is a barbaric, insensitive ritual that reeks of social

> Darwinism.

>   We cannot allow the fittest to survive on our pages. Your loss is

> someone

>   else's gain, and your gain is someone else's loss. Therefore, losers

> contribute

>   to the society and winners take away from it. Being a winner is

> unethical, while

>   a society of losers is happy and striving as a collective. In the spirit

> of diversity,

>   inclusiveness, and collectivism our contests shall have no winners.

>   Everyone is declared a loser, which in our book means an ethical team

> player.

>

>

>

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------

>

>

>   _______________________________________________

>   Gathering mailing list

>   Gathering at misera.net

>   http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

> _______________________________________________

> Gathering mailing list

> Gathering at misera.net

> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

>



_______________________________________________
Gathering mailing list
Gathering at misera.net
http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering