[kj] Strange events

Lennonka lennonka at gmail.com
Thu Nov 8 12:03:42 EST 2007


I'm going to shoot out my brain voluntarily...

(Convince me that Matrix/Terminator visions are NOT possible.
Not talking about the farm of animals...)

Lenn

PS. Yes, I'm a mad [wo]maniac. And I enjoy it!

2007/11/8, Brendan <bq at soundgardener.co.nz>:

>

> Christ on a bike, look at how our understanding of science has improved in

> the last 100 years...by about 2020 desktop computers will have the

> processing power of the human brain (which is huge), so imagine the

> computing power of 10 million of them all hooked up (distributed

> processing, it's already been happening for ages).

>

> The 21st century is very likely going to see advances in biology that will

> rival what the 20th century did with physics (which is itself improving

> steadily)...and all this while we put a hell of a lot more effort into

> killing each other than science.

>

> I think when we've had several decades of lack of progress scientifically,

> THEN focus on our limitations, until then there just doesn't seem to be

> any ceiling that I can see. There's going to be loads of ethical issues of

> course...if you have a look on Youtube and other sites, people are already

> starting to be implanted with RFID chips, US passports I gather have RFID

> chips embedded, some credit cards possibly...it's 'interesting times'

> alright.

>

> > Not exactly speaking from a scholarly point of view here (that's an

> > understatement if there ever was one), but....

> >

> > I think that moving forward or even backward through time, whether

> > possible or completely impossible, is most likely far beyond the reach

> of

> > stupid little human beings. I doubt our fragile little 90%-water bodies

> > could withstand the force exerted by such flights of fancy. It would

> > probably be the equivalent of being sucked through a black hole which,

> so

> > I've read, would theoretically turn the average person into human

> > spaghetti.

> >

> > In the grand scheme of things, we are finite little creatures living

> > finite lives and we're stranded on our little, tiny, infintesimal,

> nothing

> > of a chunk of rock and water. I doubt we're meant for much more.

> > Hopefully, i'm wrong, cuz i've got some scores to settle with a few of

> my

> > grade school teachers.

> >

> > Leigh

> >

> >

> >

> > ----- Original Message ----

> > From: Flight Bringer <flightbringer at hotmail.co.uk>

> > To: A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!)

> > <gathering at misera.net>

> > Sent: Wednesday, November 7, 2007 12:52:47 PM

> > Subject: Re: [kj] Strange events

> >

> >

> > Thats is indeed a good theory......but the reality is that we cant even

> > get the trains and buses to run on time , let alone getting them to

> arrive

> > before they've even departed.

> > But the theory below is akin to saying "It is possible for Man to

> > drink a glass of water.......so that means that its also possible to

> > Man to drink the Pacific ocean.........with all the fish included

> >

> >

> >

> > Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 17:24:46 +0000

> > From: DavidSchofield at liberata.com

> > To: gathering at misera.net

> > Subject: Re: [kj] Strange events

> >

> > PLEASE READ THE IMPORTANT NOTICE BELOW. DO NOT OPEN ANY ATTACHMENT

> WITHOUT

> > PRIOR VIRUS CHECKING.

> > ________________________________________________________

> >

> >

> > Nobody has proved that backwards time travel is possible (yet), but

> > relative forwards time travel is possible. Time can be observed going at

> > different rates depending on your relative velocity – the faster you go,

> > the slower time goes relative to someone who is stationary (not that you

> > are ever stationary – stood still you have a velocity of ~30km/s just

> from

> > the planet orbiting the sun). I think on a transatlantic flight there is

> a

> > half second or so difference, but the nearer you get to the speed of

> light

> > the larger the difference.

> >

> > This leads to the ability to travel forward in time. If you could travel

> > fast enough, for long enough, then you could get a significant

> difference

> > between your time and the time on earth. So, in theory if we threw you

> off

> > into on a mission to the nearest star at 50% of the speed of light, it

> > would take you ~40 years (of your time) but to us, it would take ~47

> > years. At 99.99% of the speed of light, it would take you 4 months, but

> to

> > us it would be 24years.

> > .

> > You can slow light down by passing it through a medium such as glass or

> > water.

> >

> > Time is theoretically linked to other forces also, sufficiently high

> > gravity or magnetic fields could also be used to slow time relatively.

> >

> > You can also get Tachyons, which are faster than light particles, but

> they

> > are still theoretical. Perhaps CERN will find some.

> >

> > My head now hurts.

> >

> > Dave

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > From: gathering-bounces at misera.net [mailto:gathering-bounces at misera.net]

> > On Behalf Of Flight Bringer

> > Sent: 07 November 2007 16:52

> > To: A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!)

> > Subject: Re: [kj] Strange events

> >

> >

> > It just isnt possible to go either back or forward in time , you can

> dress

> > it up as much as you like and give as many theories as you want , but

> > there is no way that time can be reversed .

> > It just isnt possible for that chicken that I ate today to be once

> > again running around a farm like it was a few weeks ago . If I went

> > and chopped a tree down last week and then sawed it up and burnt it to

> > ashes, there is no way that those ashes could ever reinvent themselves

> > as wood and then materialise itself as the same

> > tree.......................................Impossible

> >

> >> Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 15:05:31 +0000

> >> From: crackedmachine at yahoo.co.uk

> >> To: gathering at misera.net

> >> Subject: Re: [kj] Strange events

> >>

> >> The experiments at CERN could conceivably cause some

> >> strange effects with time/space.

> >>

> >> "The clock turned backwards"

> >>

> >>

> >> > OK, I know I am setting myself up here for ridicule

> >> and piss take.

> >>

> >> > However, despite appearances, those that have had

> >> the misfortne to meet me,

> >>

> >> > will probabbly testify that I am quite rational and

> >> sound of mind.

> >>

> >> >

> >>

> >>

> >

> >

> >

> > Are you the Quizmaster? Play BrainBattle with a friend now!

> > __________________________________________________________________

> > Liberata is the trading name of Liberata UK Limited (Registered in

> England

> > and Wales - No 1238274) and other Liberata group companies which include

> > Liberata Financial Services Limited (Registered in England and Wales -

> No

> > 5301492), an entity authorised and regulated by the Financial Services

> > Authority. The holding company is Liberata Limited ( Registered in

> England

> > and Wales - No 3987802).

> >

> >

> > Registered Office: 5th Floor Downstream Building, No. 1 London Bridge,

> > London SE1 9AJ

> >

> > IMPORTANT NOTICE:

> > This e-mail (including all attachments) is confidential and may be

> > privileged. It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s)

> only,

> > and must not be re-transmitted in an amended form without our consent.

> If

> > you have received it in error, please contact us immediately at

> > ITSecurity at liberata.com. Please then delete it and do not disclose its

> > contents to any other person.

> >

> >

> > Security and reliability of e-mails are not guaranteed. We operate

> > anti-virus programmes but you must take full responsibility for virus

> > checking this e-mail (including all attachments). Liberata UK Limited do

> > not accept any liability in respect of any damage caused by any virus

> > which is not detected.

> >

> >

> > All e-mails to and from anyone @liberata.com may be examined for

> breaches

> > of employee policies and the law. All e-mails to anyone @liberata.comare

> > communications to the company and not private and confidential to any

> > named individual.

> >

> >

> > Thsts

> >

> >

> > The next generation of MSN Hotmail has arrived - Windows Live Hotmail

> >

> >

> > -----Inline Attachment Follows-----

> >

> > _______________________________________________

> > Gathering mailing list

> > Gathering at misera.net

> > http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

> >

> > __________________________________________________

> > Do You Yahoo!?

> > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around

> > http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________

> > Gathering mailing list

> > Gathering at misera.net

> > http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

> >

>

>

> _______________________________________________

> Gathering mailing list

> Gathering at misera.net

> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering

>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/gathering/attachments/20071108/bb59e7c3/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Gathering mailing list