[kj] Jaz Straw

Jim Harper jimharper666 at yahoo.co.uk
Wed Oct 11 16:20:58 EDT 2006


Forget the lazy characterizations, please, they're not applicable here.
   
  I was simply posing the question: if one person feels there is no impediment to communication, and another does, should Person A simply accede to Person B's convenience? What compromise do you recommend? Person A removes the veil, and Person B does their best to understand? Not much of an equal compromise, is it? Person A changes, Person B doesn't have to do anything?

ade <ade at the-lab.zetnet.co.uk> wrote:
      So, in fact, the whole thing is whitey's problem & there's no compromise required? Give And Take.
   

http://www.flipsidemovies.com
http://jimharper.blogspot.com
 Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://four.pairlist.net/pipermail/gathering/attachments/20061011/742eee11/attachment.htm


More information about the Gathering mailing list