[kj] Why KJ2003 doesn't suck ...

Mark Kolmar mkolmar at gmail.com
Sun Mar 19 15:16:11 EST 2006


You make some good points that, to me, come down to how hard it is
either to recreate an earlier sound and fury, or to develop a new
sound within a set of expectations.  So I think you overstate the
problem.

I got the new single in the mail last week.  I've also heard the MP3s
of the album.  I'd like to hear Jaz use his indoor and church voices
more often.  It gives the material more range, which, by pulling back
a little, gives more peak for the heaviest sections.  The same goes
for humor.  So a track like "Afterburner" is welcome, not to mention
the nicely abstract riff.

If you are insulting Meg White, sir, I will have to ask you to step outside.

--Mark

On 3/9/06, fluw <fluwdot at earthlink.net> wrote:
>  when building a case for the suckage of kj 2003 one doesn't really need to
> say anything more than to note the record includes   "The House That Pain
> Built", case closed.
>
>  but......
>
>  blood on your hands has ok lyrics and an ok performance by jaz,
> unfortunately, boyh suffers from a banal (for geordie) funk guitar riff in
> the verse, and the chorus could have been more inspired if arranged by a
> flat fore-headed nine year old with a frayed string tennis racket and a
> bouncy mattress. as for the drums? they sound like meg white's menstrual
> drippings. BOYH should be called you've got blood on your cankels !
>  as for seeing red, it should be titled peeing red
>
>  any other alternate titles?
>
>  besides,
>  geordie sounds like he sleep walked his way through a majority of 03 and
> the importance a kj record containing a great performance by geordie is
> fundamental.


More information about the Gathering mailing list