[kj] Maggots&Meat

[peter.west410]

That not what I heard.Somebody who was there at the time tells a different
story.But whether she was the building receptionist or MM receptionist is
irrelevant,She still had nothing to do with it.And whether she saw the
"funny"side to it later is also irrelevant.Wrong is wrong,Whether people
think it's funny or not
     I think you are getting the phrase"Free speech "confused.Free speech is
peoples right to say what they want,without fear of being persecuted.So Jaz
was well with-in his rights to counter-criticize the journalist,But to try
and physically harm her is not freedom of speech(To save you the bother of
contesting this and me replying,Ill save you the time and reply first)Jaz
aim was to put a curse on the person ,This would lead to harm on the
receiving person.And harming people is not speech is it.Apart from
Rangecroft does anyone else here revel in harming women

 PW
You know I make sense


----- Original Message -----
From: "Neil Perry" <neilfperry at btinternet.com>
To: "A list about all things Killing Joke (the band!)"
<gathering at misera.net>
Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2004 1:13 PM
Subject: Re: [kj] Maggots&Meat


> The woman was the receptionist for Melody Maker, not
> the whole building. She was called Marcia. I got to
> know her a few years later and she was able to see the
> funny side of the whole incident.
>
> The incident did not go against the 'free speech
> ethic'. Melody Maker had exercised their right to free
> speech. Jaz was just exercising his.
> N
>
>
>  --- "peter.west410" <peter.west410 at ntlworld.com>
> wrote:
> > Although it was a long time ago,Some people still
> > revel in the fact they
> > done this,Has anybody grown older & wiser and now
> > realise this is not a
> > clever thing to do.
> >       1.The lady who was on the receiving end was
> > just the receptionist of
> > the whole building,Which contained many
> > companies.(Would you be happy if you
> > wife/daughter /Mum went to work and this happened to
> > her?)And was therefore
> > just an innocent bystander
> >        2.After this many reporters would nt report
> > on KJ.Is this the
> > reason?Would you report on a band if you knew that
> > if they did nt like what
> > you said then they would seek retribution?
> >         3.It goes against the free speech ethic
> >         4.If governments or other agencies adopted
> > this practise of
> > terrorising/frightening people who disagreed with
> > them,would nt they be
> > labelled as an oppressive regime?
> >           PW
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Gathering mailing list
> > Gathering at misera.net
> > http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Gathering mailing list
> Gathering at misera.net
> http://four.pairlist.net/mailman/listinfo/gathering
>