[kj] alsoutbe bllkcoos

Bo Krogsgaard gathering@misera.net
Wed, 17 Sep 2003 20:47:35 +0200 (CEST)


On Wed, 17 Sep 2003, mike coles wrote:

> Aoccdrnig to a rscheearch at Cmabrigde Uinervtisy, it deosn't mttaer in waht
> oredr the ltteers in a wrod are, the olny iprmoetnt tihng is taht the frist
> and lsat ltteer be at the rghit pclae. The rset can be a total mses and you
> can sitll raed it wouthit porbelm. Tihs is bcuseae the huamn mnid deos not
> raed ervey lteter by istlef, but the wrod as a wlohe.

Which, according to the linguistic knowledge i have, is valid as long as
you stick to mono- and bisyllabic words. Go beyond that and your rule
breaks.


b