[kj] FW: Three Easy Pieces for Any Decent American (from Michael Moore )

Phillipps Marc gathering@misera.net
Tue, 16 Sep 2003 16:49:11 +0100


Interesting reading . . . 

Also, anyone who hasn't seen Bowling For Columbine should 

Marc. 

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Michael Moore's Mailing List [SMTP:mailinglist@michaelmoore.com]
> Sent:	Tuesday, September 16, 2003 2:56 PM
> To:	marc.phillipps@enfield.nhs.uk
> Subject:	Three Easy Pieces for Any Decent American (from Michael
> Moore)
> 
> Three Easy Pieces for Any Decent American (from Michael Moore)
> September 15, 2003
> 
> There are many otherwise decent Americans who are either still on the
> fence about George W. Bush or they actually profess to like the man. They
> are the ones who make up the 58% approval ratings and the 64% who say they
> still believe the war was a good idea. You know these people well. They
> work next to you, or they sit in the classroom next to you, or they may
> even be sitting at your kitchen table right now! 
> 
> I think that we need to hold out a hand to them, not in a partisan sort of
> way, and not with any condescension. I think that if we share with them a
> few pieces of information, and do it with common sense instead of
> politics, there is a chance we just might break through and turn things
> around. Perhaps it's my foolish optimism in the goodness that is in every
> person, and in their ability to ultimately know right from wrong. 
> 
> I would like to give you three little vignettes to share with them. They
> are so simple and so shocking in their very content that, if you pass them
> around the office, the school, the neighborhood or the bedroom, it may
> just do the trick. Here they are: 
> 
> 1. GEORGE AND LAURA ON 9/11 -- A BARREL OF LAUGHS! 
> 
> The following is an interview with the First Couple from the current issue
> of one of my favorite magazines, Ladies Home Journal (Oct. '03). They are
> asked about what September 11, 2001, was like for them personally, and,
> although over 3,000 people had just perished, George W. was able to find
> some humor by the end of that day: 
> 
> Peggy Noonan (the interviewer): You were separated on September 11th. What
> was it like when you saw each other again? 
> 
> Laura Bush: Well, we just hugged. I think there was a certain amount of
> security in being with each other than being apart. 
> 
> George W. Bush: But the day ended on a relatively humorous note. The
> agents said, "you'll be sleeping downstairs. Washington's still a
> dangerous place." And I said no, I can't sleep down there, the bed didn't
> look comfortable. I was really tired, Laura was tired, we like our own
> bed. We like our own routine. You know, kind of a nester. I knew I had to
> deal with the issue the next day and provide strength and comfort to the
> country, and so I needed rest in order to be mentally prepared. So I told
> the agent we're going upstairs, and he reluctantly said okay. Laura wears
> contacts, and she was sound asleep. Barney was there. And the agent comes
> running up and says, "We're under attack. We need you downstairs," and so
> there we go. I'm in my running shorts and my T-shirt, and I'm barefooted.
> Got the dog in one hand, Laura had a cat, I'm holding Laura --
> 
> Laura Bush: I don't have my contacts in , and I'm in my fuzzy house
> slippers --
> 
> George W. Bush: And this guy's out of breath, and we're heading straight
> down to the basement because there's an incoming unidentified airplane,
> which is coming toward the White House. Then the guy says it's a friendly
> airplane. And we hustle all the way back up stairs and go to bed. 
> 
> Mrs. Bush: [LAUGHS] And we just lay there thinking about the way we must
> have looked. 
> 
> Peggy Noonan (interviewer): So the day starts in tragedy and ends in Marx
> Brothers. 
> 
> George W. Bush: THAT'S RIGHT-- WE GOT A LAUGH OUT OF IT!
> 
> (end)
> 
> Although America had just suffered the worst attack ever on our own soil,
> somehow this man was able to end his day on a funny note. I wonder how
> many of the 3,000 families who lost someone earlier that day had a funny
> ending before they went to sleep? Please read the above exchange aloud to
> anyone who will listen. It speaks volumes. 
> 
> 2. WE HAVE JUST WRECKED OUR KIDS' FUTURE. 
> 
> The first paragraph in yesterday's New York Times story on how Bush has
> taken a record surplus and demolished it into a record deficit was one of
> the best lead paragraphs I have ever read in a newspaper article. 
> 
> Here's how it went
> <http://www.nytimes.com/2003/09/14/politics/14DEFI.html?ex=1064116800&en=4
> 92a7429965853da&ei=5062&partner=GOOGLE>:
> 
> "When President Bush informed the nation last Sunday night that remaining
> in Iraq next year will cost another $87 billion, many of those who will
> actually pay that bill were unable to watch. They had already been put to
> bed by their parents." 
> 
> Bingo. Gee, I hope the kids thank us some day! 
> 
> Here's the next paragraph (my emphasis added): 
> 
> "Administration officials acknowledged the next day that every dollar of
> that cost will be BORROWED, a loan that economists say will be repaid by
> the NEXT generation of taxpayers AND THE GENERATION AFTER THAT. The $166
> BILLION cost of the work SO FAR in Iraq and Afghanistan, which has stunned
> many in Washington, will be added to what was already the largest budget
> deficit the nation has ever known." 
> 
> Every conservative friend of yours should weep when they read that, and
> then you should hug them and tell them that it'll be okay, once we all do
> what we need to do. 
> 
> 3. WHAT WOULD $87 BILLION BUY? 
> 
> If you can't get through this list without wanting to throw up, I'll
> understand. But pass it around anyway. This is the nail in the Iraq War's
> coffin for any sane, thinking individual, regardless of their political
> stripe (thanks to TomPaine.com and the Center for American Progress
> <http://www.tompaine.com/feature2.cfm/ID/8857>)... 
> 
> To get some perspective, here are some real-life comparisons about what
> $87 billion means: 
> 
> $87 Billion Is More Than The Combined Total Of All State Budget Deficits
> In The United States.
> 
> The Bush administration proposed absolutely zero funds to help states deal
> with these deficits, despite the fact that their tax cuts drove down state
> revenues. [Source: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities] 
> 
> $87 Billion Is Enough To Pay The 3.3 Million People Who Have Lost Jobs
> Under George W. Bush $26,363 Each!
> 
> The unemployment benefits extension passed by Congress at the beginning of
> this year provides zero benefits to "workers who exhausted their regular,
> state unemployment benefits and cannot find work." All told, two-thirds of
> unemployed workers have exhausted their benefits. [Source: Center on
> Budget and Policy Priorities] 
> 
> $87 Billion Is More Than DOUBLE The Total Amount The Government Spends On
> Homeland Security.
> 
> The U.S. spends about $36 billion on homeland security. Yet, Sen. Warren
> Rudman (R-N.H.) wrote "America will fall approximately $98.4 billion short
> of meeting critical emergency responder needs" for homeland security
> without a funding increase. [Source: Council on Foreign Relations] 
> 
> $87 Billion Is 87 Times The Amount The Federal Government Spends On After
> School Programs.
> 
> George W. Bush proposed a budget that reduces the $1 billion for
> after-school programs to $600 million -- cutting off about 475,000
> children from the program. [Source: The Republican-dominated House
> Appropriations Committee] 
> 
> $87 Billion Is More Than 10 Times What The Government Spends On All
> Environmental Protection.
> 
> The Bush administration requested just $7.6 billion for the entire
> Environmental Protection Agency. This included a 32 percent cut to water
> quality grants, a 6 percent reduction in enforcement staff, and a 50
> percent cut to land acquisition and conservation. [Source: Natural
> Resources Defense Council]
> 
> There you go. In black and white. A few million of you will receive this
> letter. Please share the above with at least a half-dozen people today and
> tomorrow. I, like you, do not want to see another approval rating over
> 50%. 
> 
> Yours, 
> Michael Moore
> www.michaelmoore.com <http://www.michaelmoore.com>
> moorelist@aol.com <mailto:moorelist@aol.com>
> 
> PS. Thanks for the astounding response to the Wesley Clark letter (and for
> your kind comments to me). Over 95% of the thousands of letters received
> favored the General tossing his helmet in the ring. All were passed on to
> his organization. More to come on the road to removing Bush...
> 
> --------------------------------------
> To Unsubscribe, please click here
> <http://www.michaelmoore.com/mikesmailinglist/box.php?funcml=unsub2&nlbox[
> 1]=1&email=marc.phillipps@enfield.nhs.uk>. 
> 
> 
This communication may contain information that is confidential and legally
privileged.It is for the exclusive use of the intended recipient(s). If you
are not the intented recipient(s), please note that any form of
distribution, copying or use of this communication or the information within
is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have recieved this
communication in error, please return it to the sender, then delete and
destoy any copies of it. The Health Informatics Service disclaims any
liability for action taken reliance on the content of this message. This
communication is from the Health Informatics Service serving Barnet Enfield
& Haringey  Health Communities.