[Scons-users] [Scons-dev] Feedback on issue creation template

[Eric Fahlgren]

Our procedure at work also calls for paragraphs on "what you see" and "what
you expected to see".  The former is often some unexpected behavior or a
stack dump, the latter is a short description of how you think your
reproducer should work.  Of course, we don't vet things as well, users can
just put in any old thing they don't understand, so your first item about
"bring it to the list" probably minimizes some of what I've mentioned.

On Sat, Mar 17, 2018 at 11:00 AM, Daniel Moody <dmoody256 at gmail.com> wrote:

> What about adding a requirement to paste the link to the scons users
> archived thread in the submitted issue for reference and due process?
>
> On Sat, Mar 17, 2018, 1:54 PM Bill Deegan <bill at baddogconsulting.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> I've just added an issue creation template to Github.
>>
>> See it here:
>> https://github.com/SCons/scons/blob/master/.github/issue_template.md
>>
>> If you have a moment to take a look and let me know if I've missed any
>> information which should be provided when filing a new issue.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Bill
>> SCons Project Co-Manager
>> _______________________________________________
>> Scons-users mailing list
>> Scons-users at scons.org
>> https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-dev mailing list
> Scons-dev at scons.org
> https://pairlist2.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist4.pair.net/pipermail/scons-users/attachments/20180317/bd7619cc/attachment.html>