[Scons-users] Dependency cycles. 2.4.1 -> 2.5.1

[Pierre-Luc Boily]

What I had in mind when I wrote that I can`t generate tree with 2.5.1 is
because 2.5.1 output many cycle dependency problems Then, it seems normal to
me that no tree can be generated with such problem.

Do you think that this "cross-language implicit dependency support" added in
2.5.0 could lead to my cycle dependency problems, although all my files
involved in the error log are c++ files? 

And do you think that the mutual dependency I found in my tree (2.4.1) could
lead to problems with 2.5.1?

thx a lot for your time.



--
View this message in context: http://scons.1086193.n5.nabble.com/Dependency-cycles-2-4-1-2-5-1-tp40926p40931.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.