[Scons-users] Technical question abouir --debug=explain

[Pierre-Luc Boily]

I tried same test on a smaller part of the code to get smaller
tree/traces.  I also rework the SConscript to make it simpler, and I don't
see anything shocking.
Tree : https://pastebin.com/iuwKekwD
Trace: https://pastebin.com/KwAieVGE

SConscript :
Import('envService')
envService.validate_supported_platform('posix')
env = envService.get_env32()
env.USE_QT()
env.Library(target = env.libName(),source = ["aiui_controller.cpp",
"aiui_widget_impl.cpp", "aiui_widget.cpp"])

Do you see something unusual?

thx

On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 12:07 PM, Bill Deegan <bill at baddogconsulting.com>
wrote:

> You might also run with
>
> --taskmastertrace=FILE
>
> And look at the generated file with respect to the source and target(s) involved.
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 10:31 AM, Pierre-Luc Boily <
> pierreluc.boily at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Yes it is.  It must be something with my implementation for sure., I'll
>> dig more on my scons implementation...  It might be related with my
>> pseudo-builders.  I have an implementation on top of Library, SharedLibrary
>> and Program calls, in order to be able to generated artifacts in the
>> correct variant dir. The Variant dir given to SConscript looks like
>> "/svn/products/build/debug/src".  Then, my pseudo-builder receives the
>> variant dir and add a subfolder like that "/svn/products/build/debug/src/i86-pc-linux-gnu".
>> See https://pastebin.com/6fTVDnMa.   Code executed from pseudo-builders
>> is the same from windows and centos.  So, it might be something elsewhere
>> as well....
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Bill Deegan <bill at baddogconsulting.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> That is unexpected.
>>> Is it repeatable?
>>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:17 AM, Pierre-Luc Boily <
>>> pierreluc.boily at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello!
>>>>
>>>> Was doing small test yesterday by changing a cpp file and compiling with
>>>> --debug=explain.  I realized that the explain argument did not print the
>>>> message I was expected on my centos build :
>>>>
>>>> scons: rebuilding
>>>> `build/debug/sim/simulator/vr/pbs/fpsm/i86-pc-linux-gnu/pbsf
>>>> psm_acreport.o'
>>>> because:
>>>>            `sim/simulator/vr/pbs/fpsm/pbsfpsm_acreport.cpp' is no
>>>> longer a
>>>> dependency
>>>>            `sim/simulator/vr/pbs/fpsm/pbsfpsm_acreport.cpp' is a new
>>>> dependency
>>>>
>>>> I did some test on windows as well, by changing a cpp file too, and I
>>>> got
>>>> this :
>>>>
>>>> scons: rebuilding
>>>> `build\debug\sr\sra\src\flatGui\win32\ASRResultObserverUI.obj' because
>>>> `sr\sra\src\flatGui\ASRResultObserverUI.cpp' changed
>>>>
>>>> which is the message that I do expect.  So, I am wondering if it is the
>>>> message on centos makes sense. This message sounds like that the cpp is
>>>> being removed.  I double-check my pseudo-builder that creates Library
>>>> and
>>>> Program, and the code executed is the same for both centos and windows.
>>>>
>>>> I am using scons 2.5.1 with python 2.7.13
>>>>
>>>> Thx
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sent from: http://scons.1086193.n5.nabble.com/Users-f16930.html
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Scons-users mailing list
>>>> Scons-users at scons.org
>>>> https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Scons-users mailing list
>>> Scons-users at scons.org
>>> https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Scons-users mailing list
>> Scons-users at scons.org
>> https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-users mailing list
> Scons-users at scons.org
> https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist4.pair.net/pipermail/scons-users/attachments/20171219/4795f3a1/attachment-0001.html>