[Scons-users] Debian/Gentoo SCons 'recommendation'
William Blevins
wblevins001 at gmail.com
Mon Jan 11 18:44:45 EST 2016
I don't see the harm, but maybe that's too big for GSOC? It's a lot of
Autotools vs Other politics, etc.
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:41 PM, Bill Deegan <bill at baddogconsulting.com>
wrote:
> Maybe a GSOC project?
> (or are we too late already for that?)
>
> -Bill
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 3:24 PM, William Blevins <wblevins001 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Yeah. This was discuss end of last year I think, but didn't gain
>> traction. Maybe we want to add this to the roadmap, but priorities aren't
>> my area of expertise?
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:19 PM, Bill Deegan <bill at baddogconsulting.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> William,
>>>
>>> I agree.
>>> It should be fairly simple to alleviate all those complaints with some
>>> standard logic, and/or a boilerplate generator...
>>> -Bill
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 2:27 PM, William Blevins <wblevins001 at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It's complicated, but the main argument is that expect to interact with
>>>> packages in an GNU Autotools specific sort of way; this is also why they
>>>> discourage Waf while praising Make (but with emphasis on using autotools
>>>> paradigms.
>>>>
>>>> We could probably work towards alleviating their opinion on this by
>>>> making some sort of linux packaging wrapper.
>>>>
>>>> V/R,
>>>> William
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 9:44 PM, Saša Janiška <gour at atmarama.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> just discovered this one:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://wiki.debian.org/UpstreamGuide#SCons
>>>>>
>>>>> and wonder why is it so?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Sincerely,
>>>>> Gour
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Whenever and wherever there is a decline in religious practice,
>>>>> O descendant of Bharata, and a predominant rise of irreligion —
>>>>> at that time I descend Myself.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Scons-users mailing list
>>>>> Scons-users at scons.org
>>>>> https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Scons-users mailing list
>>>> Scons-users at scons.org
>>>> https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Scons-users mailing list
>>> Scons-users at scons.org
>>> https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Scons-users mailing list
>> Scons-users at scons.org
>> https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-users mailing list
> Scons-users at scons.org
> https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist4.pair.net/pipermail/scons-users/attachments/20160111/3c1aa554/attachment.html>
More information about the Scons-users
mailing list