[Scons-users] Need clarifications about --implicit-deps-unchanged

William Blevins wblevins001 at gmail.com
Fri Dec 16 11:44:37 EST 2016

Consider how the option works. SCons uses previously stored information in
.sconsdblite (name check) rather than getting dependencies implicitly from
the source. If you are starting from scratch then that dependency
information will not exist. I don't know if SCons errors in this case or
just ignores the argument but this is not an appropriate use case.

On Dec 16, 2016 9:12 AM, "Pierre-Luc Boily" <pierreluc.boily at gmail.com>

> Thx!
> One last question.  In our build server where release is created, the same
> process is always executed :
> 1 - Delete previous check out
> 2 - svn co last revision
> 3 - make
> For our build server, since it is always a one shot deal, does that make
> sense there to use --implicit-deps-unchanged to speed up compilation?
> thx
> --
> View this message in context: http://scons.1086193.n5.nabble.com/Need-
> clarifications-about-implicit-deps-unchanged-tp40840p40848.html
> Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> Scons-users mailing list
> Scons-users at scons.org
> https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist4.pair.net/pipermail/scons-users/attachments/20161216/7a4e1fbc/attachment.html>

More information about the Scons-users mailing list