[Scons-users] For consideration ..... Documentationclarification

[Dan McNaul]

OK Bill,

I went through the work to be able to make changes to SCons.  I made the Man Page changes and ultimately “Pull’d Request”

I set you as the reviewer because I didn’t know any better.

Dan

From: Bill Deegan 
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2016 1:01 PM
To: SCons users mailing list 
Subject: Re: [Scons-users] For consideration ..... Documentationclarification

Dan,


Can you file a doc bug on scons.tigris.org?

Or even better.. a pull request on bitbucket.org


Thanks,

Bill


On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Dan McNaul <danmcnaul at gmail.com> wrote:

  A documentation clarification suggestion.


  http://scons.org/doc/HTML/scons-man.html


  The “OPTIONS” section


  The –site-dir=dir option can be clarified or expanded to say something similar to what the –Y option says.

  Multiple -Yoptions may be specified, in which case the repositories are searched in the order specified.


  or

  Multiple –site-dir=dir options may be specified, in which case the site_scons locations are searched in the order specified.


  The –site-dir gives a clue that multiples can be used, but doesn’t flat out say it.   I’ve tested the multiple entries with directories that do not contain the tools and it works.

  Dan McNaul

  _______________________________________________
  Scons-users mailing list
  Scons-users at scons.org
  https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Scons-users mailing list
Scons-users at scons.org
https://pairlist4.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/scons-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://pairlist4.pair.net/pipermail/scons-users/attachments/20160805/f5217202/attachment.html>